Spiritual Economics Now

If you have a trip of 100 km. (pronounced:  KIL’ o-meters) (62 miles), and you travel at 120 kph (75 mph) which is acceptable, in a 110 (70) ‘speed zone’, you will arrive 50 minutes later.  If you increase your speed to 130 kph (80 mph), you will save 4 min.  Unless it is the difference between catching and missing a train, the potential loss is vastly greater than the win.  That speed will definitely cost you in gas and will possibly cost you in: safety, delay by the cops, and fines. Four minutes is not worth all that.

Now, multiply your trip times 4, i.e.:  400 km. and drive 120 (75), you will arrive 3:20 later.  If you drive at an increased speed of only 10 kph (6 mph), i.e.: 130 (80), you will save only 15 minutes. Over a time of 3 hours, 15 minutes is negligible and, hence, just not worth it, considering that you also increase the likelihood of being stopped by the cops, and the consequences of a potential mishap.

With several provincial and state parks, along the route, where the “speed limit” is 90 (55), a 400 km. (248 mi.) trip will take you 4:26.   If you consider that 120 (75) is still an acceptable speed, then the 3:20 trip means you would save over an hour. That is dramatic but what is even more dramatic is that, almost certainly, you will get stopped by a cop, or become very dangerous to either you or someone else, because the posted speed of 90 (55) MEANS that the conditions –wildlife, construction, or roads– are such that going any faster WILL create a problem.  I hit a deer a few years back and not only did it wreck the front of my car but also it so upset me, I had to stop for a half-hour. Had I been speeding, the situation would have been even worse. Also, consider that you cannot maintain that 120 (75) speed in those zones, simply due to those conditions. Ergo, you will not save yourself the hour, no matter what. However, the fines are egregious, the potential loss of life becomes frightful, and just being stopped by a cop will cause you to lose about ½ the time of your anticipated saving.  So, it simply is NEVER worth it to speed.

The MOST IMPORTANT reason not to speed is:  the cops WANT you to speed.  We all know that they don’t give a damn about our safety; they care about collecting revenue, getting promotions, and making us miserable.  Since they have abandoned their role as Peace Officer and their true purpose, which is to protect us, we ought to have nothing to do with them.  They have no right to stop us unless they witness a breach of the peace, so, for ALL our sakes, please do not ‘make their day’ by speeding.  It is NEVER worth the short-lived, only slightly possible saving of some time. Take along some tunes, or an audible book, or a friend and enjoy the ride.

Make the cops miserable. This is the best way to do it.  I thank you and your family thanks you.

…

Since it seems –at least so far– as if we are unable to remove ourselves from this insidious Commerce Game, we might as well play it so that it hurts ‘them’.  We live in a world of commerce and, if there is no getting out of it, then, the only way to survive this is to do to them what they do to us:  charge them up the yin-yang.

Dean Clifford has given his final lecture on his “game-ending” information:

The Three Entities: the man; the Trust; and the Officer of the Trust who can authorize and off-set charges, i.e.: handle the accounting, and he has an residence, aka address of a branch-office of the corporation, e.g.: CRA. The Officer has no rights whilst he performs a function of government, for which he ought to be paid. Any charges against the trust would be handled by the officer but he is not personally liable for any fees, fines, etc.  So, occupying the position of officer, as long as we are not held personally liable and as long as we get paid to do the job, which they intend us to contract to perform, is alright. The same man can hold different capacities.  They want the all-cap last name, John Henry DOE, to show up as officer, but we can’t mix jurisdictions, i.e.: we can be either the man OR the officer, but not both at the same time.

What seems to have some clout is a Fee Schedule –itemizing all the things which they might want us to do for the trust and the costs, along with a mention that failure to settle promptly may result in Civil Court action / Commercial Lien, along with a note:  “You can force me to do anything, but you can’t force me to do it for free, as that would be slavery, which has been outlawed internationally, via Article 4 of the UDHR. Since all this is about commerce, and not justice, then, before I, John Henry Doe, perform as the officer/trustee, John Henry DOE, of the DOE, JOHN HENRY Trust, there is the matter of my fee which is $50,000 an hour, or any part thereof, and, if I am required to go to court in order to handle the accounting, then, the fee is $100,000 an hour, in advance. Upon my receipt of said payment, I shall (pay a fine/appear in court/file for a tax return, whatever).  If you don’t like my terms, then hire someone else for the job.  Please send payment to: Name ? address.”

We ARE in ‘their’ system and so, if they want to force us to do something, then it will cost them and, just like any other contract, there are terms and, if the terms are too steep for them, they are free to end the negotiations and renege on the contract. In other words, we ought to make it so that THEY do not want to contract with US, rather than vice versa.  Since the only language they speak is force, contract, and money, this might be the best way to handle them: treat them as they treat us.

Dean told the story of his brother who was pursued by police, but didn’t stop. Since he had a “Fee Schedule” in place; i.e.: he had sent it to the cop shop, suddenly, the cop came to a screeching halt and turned around. Clearly, the cop had ‘googled’ the plate, as they do, and read the warning, “DO NOT STOP”. When our hero got home, he called the sergeant and told him, “One of your goons tried to stop me. You DO know that if I had stopped, it would have cost you $200,000.”  After some muffled comments, the sergeant said, “I don’t want to continue this conversation.”

I carry my fee schedule in the car and figure if a cop stops me, I’ll just tape it to the window so this is ALL he sees. The threat of Commercial Lien ought to get their attention, if the “Fee for being stopped”, in the amount of $250,000, doesn’t.

Dean claims that, on the back of the BC, it reads, “For Treasury Use Only”, so if we use the BC, either we ARE the Treasury and so we are liable as surety, or we are NOT the Treasury and so we are acting in fraud.  Use of the BC is only to prove the existence of the bond, the value of which will handle all liability for that Trust. Our use of the BC as ID for anything, such as application for DL, passport, etc., would be relinquishing our rights –particularly, our right not to contract.

One might want to warn the Court, in advance of any hearing, “If I am dragged to Court, I’ll hand the order to the Crown and I’ll charge you $100,000 to do it”, so that if one were to find himself in front of a judge/administrator, against his will, then he can say, “This court cannot proceed, as there is an outstanding bill before the court.”

Dean’s approach in response to a judge’s order is,  ”Is this an order?  Well, as soon as I get paid –because I don’t work for free any more than you do– I’ll be sure that it gets carried out.”  After getting the cheque (do not allow the court to proceed until the matter of payment is settled), we can hand the order to the prosecutor and say, “You hold legal title to the name of the trust; you’re the trustee; here; handle this.”  Then we can say to everyone present, “I just got paid $100,000 to walk over to the Crown attorney and hand him his order.”

Conclusion: For so long we made a distinction between only two names.  The distinction must now be made among three names.  Keep that in mind.

…

Ridiculous Ritual:  Daylight Saving Time

DST is not “Daylight Savings Time”, as in Savings Accounts or Savings and Loans.  There is no “saving” of daylight. It comes and goes every day and we cannot hang onto it or save it to use at a later time.  I told a friend I’d see him at 4 PM, i.e.: 4 hours post meridian, i.e.: 4 hours after noon.  I quickly added, “I don’t change my clocks, so that’s 4 on my clock but likely it is 5 on your clock if you are obeying GCT.  He asked, “What is GCT?”  and I told him Government-Control Time.  I am always a bit surprised by those who tell me that they are sovereign, know who they are, not run by the government, etc. and then go and change their clocks from natural sun-time to what the government tells them is the time.  They ought to re-read the book, “1984”:  “How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?”  “What time is it, Winston?”

The controllers’ main game is to disorient us from nature which is from where we derive our power and recollection of our omniscience. They are determined to undermine the value of the sun and nature, and force us to believe that the sun has either a bad impact on us and, ergo, the need for sun-block or chem-trails– or no impact on us at all –by telling us that the sun is not overhead when it is. Nature would beg to differ about the value the sun has on us, but if we got “back to nature”, we could be re-trained in all our natural talents; but the controllers can’t have that.  Don’t let them tell you what time it is when it is contrary to what nature indicates.  Only a bureaucracy can make up the idiocy that taking an hour away from the sunlight of the morning  and adding it onto the sunlight of the evening will give us an extra hour of sunlight. They are morons and their intent is to mess with our natural inclinations and instincts, just as they have messed with the natural patterns of all other animals. Quit letting them do so.

PS:  Midnight is 12 MN and Midday is 12 Noon.  At noon, the sun is directly over the meridian and so it can be neither ‘ante’ nor ‘post’, i.e.: neither AM nor PM.  12 AM would be 12 hours Ante-Meridian, i.e.: midnight, and 12 PM would be 12 hours Post-Meridian, which is also midnight.  So, please learn that 12 can be either MN or Noon, only.  The alternative is to learn the 24-hour clock.  There is no 12 AM or 12 PM.  They are meaningless.

Ridiculous Clichés:

1.   “I want to share with you….”

A fellow actually said to me, “I want to share with you something terrible that happened to me…..”   I said, “Well, if it’s already occurred and I wasn’t there to experience it WITH you, and I was NOT, then how can I “share” it with you; and why would you WANT me to ’share’ your terrible incident?  Because misery loves company?  ”Sharing it with me” is not only an absurd concept but also a malicious one!” Maybe what you are saying is that you want to TELL me about it, not “share” it with me.

2.  “Do you see the glass as half full or half empty?” What a stupid question!  If one is filling the glass and it is half-way, then it is half-full.  If one is drinking from or emptying the glass and it is half-way, then it is half-empty.  This has absolutely nothing to do with one’s attitude towards anything.

3.  ”Absolute” describes degree; it is neither affirmative nor negative. So, when someone says, “absolutely” in response to my question, I ask, “Do you mean absolutely NOT or absolutely SO?”

…