Spiritual Economics Now

Two Completely Different, Separate, Distinctive Forms of Accounting.

(I’ll make this as painless as I can)

If we go into a bank, find the “loan” officer, and say, “I want you to monetize some of my credit for me; what is your fee?”, he will not grasp this and ask if we want a loan. Do we explain, right then and there, that he will not be ‘lending’ us anything; he will be only performing a service for which he is already being compensated, in the form of a bi-weekly salary, to make such transactions, yet, what we want to know is, what percentage of said transaction does he charge for processing? .5%?, 3%?, … how much?

Or do we play the game and sign the note, hand it over, and deal with it later? What about the mortgage? Why would any sane man tell a bank that it can take his house from him if he fails to hand over a portion of his life and labour, over the next 20-30 years, in the form of notes which are meant for ‘private debt’ only – not ‘public debt’, and, to boot, in violation of public policy, after he has already fronted the credit to the bank for which he has received a cheque in return and that transaction was complete the instant that occurred? He would do that only if:

1. he were tricked into believing that his signature on the promissory note
a) had no value, and b) did not fund the monetization of the cheque he received; or,
2. he was a victim of extortion and fraud; or,
3. all of the above.

At the end of every bank day, all accounts must balance or nobody goes home. Banks are audited every month and if there is a glitch, I’m certain there are heavy-duty fines. No one leaves the bank at the end of the day until the ledger shows that Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable are balanced and zeroed. But, if the bank has lent out ‘money’ or even credit, wouldn’t there be an imbalance? Wouldn’t it show that the payable side of the ledger was in red or not matching the receivable side? Do banksters just hope that people will pay back what was lent out? Would such a huge industry trust this? Or would they get paid up front before anything ever left the bank? hmmm. I suspect that the reason that banks are the wealthiest institutions on the planet – maybe with the exception of the genocidal pharmaceutical industry – is because they get paid in advance before they risk any possible loss. When one is this big, one gets to call the shots. It would not work for them to sit around hoping that those to whom they gave cash, cheques, credit, etc. would swing ‘round to their place of biz every month in order to pay back what they ‘owe’. No corporation with any clout would do business that way. One might argue that they can sell the collateral, yet, banks are not in the business of pawnbroking; they are in the business of amassing cash. Pawnbroking is not a multibillion dollar industry. Wasting their time, even subcontracting it out to vendors, is not their style. They simply want the cash to roll in and so they set up their business plan well in advance of any alleged loan, in order to have that work for them. So, have we established that “hoping” to get paid back, even with collateral, is not good business sense?

A friend complained recently, “I’m in so much debt; I don’t know what to do.” Clearly, she had not read my book which emphatically points out that men and women cannot possibly be ‘in debt’. We cannot pay a debt, ergo, we cannot incur debt. It is an impossibility. Only the public can incur debt and incur it they do. Yet, this is their debt, not ours. We make the mistake of falling for their inflicting upon us the responsibility of paying their debt simply because they have programmed us into believing that we are the liable party. How did they manage this? By convincing us that we are a name and when they charge the Name, this makes us the surety – the one responsible for paying the charge. This is fine as long as we know how to do so, yet, we have been convinced that we can pay only with our labour which we exchange for dollars.

The glitch is that public entities can not pay their own debts because they are bankrupt and no bankrupt entity has any credit. Since we believe we must earn our living, when the bills arrive, we think we must pay. But, how can we do that when there are two entirely separate forms of ‘accounting’ and the one in which we operate – ‘compensation for our labour’ – has nothing to do with the form of ‘accounting’ which the public uses to ‘adjust its books’. The accounting sciences of private exchange and public bookkeeping are as unrelated as any other of the sciences, e.g.: Medicine and Health, which have only one thing in common – the human body, yet, that is where it all comes to a screeching halt. One involves pharmaceuticals and medical treatments which keep a body ill; the other involves healing by nature which results in a body becoming healthy. One is based upon big business, the other is handled by the spirit inhabiting the body. The differences between these two sciences are innumerable compared to the one and only similarity.

This is tantamount to Astronomy and Astrology. They have one thing in common – stars. After that, the differences between the two sciences are too numerous to list. They are completely unrelated; just as the means by which we men and women become compensated by one to whom we have given our energy and time and the means by which the public creates debt upon its books and desperately searches for someone willing to off-set it and allow them to balance their books. The first is known as ‘money of exchange’ (compensation) and the second is known as ‘money of account’ (adjusting/balancing the books). It is called ‘double-entry bookkeeping’. The two are completely unrelated, however, we have been tricked into believing that the two systems cross over. They do not and cannot.

When we offer our energy and our time in the form of ‘labour’ we expect to be compensated for it by the one to whom we give it. I shan’t elaborate upon the spiritual mess into which this has gotten us; suffice it to say that this has to stop if we are to prevail against the psychopathocracy which runs the world, if for no other reason than it will train our minds to see the distinction between the two forms of accounting. Whether we are compensated by substance, i.e.: gold, silver, gifts, time, etc. or the paper commonly known as ‘money’ matters not to us because we have negotiated and agreed to what is fair ‘money of exchange’. Due to that agreement, it is no one else’s business. It is a private contract based upon a meeting of the minds. No third party is permitted. Accordingly, that compensation, no matter what form it takes, cannot be taxed by a third party which might suddenly want in on the contract. It is a private contract, not a public contract.

The other, completely unrelated, form of accounting is ‘money of account’ wherein the public creates debt. This is done all the time because this is what the public does. This is how corporations come into being, aeroports get built, and yes, (yawn) roads get maintained (where some people still think that taxes go). It has nothing to do with what we do; it is simply how they operate in order to provide us what we need and want. They are involved in work which has to do with commerce. We are not or, at least, ought not to be, yet, since we are, please let’s learn how to do so without ruining our lives.

Public Accounting = Money of Account aka Double-entry Bookkeeping aka Debt Set-off

The public sends us a bill so we can set-off their debt. The bill’s amount indicates the amount of our unlimited credit they have used without our consent. They created it, but, they cannot set it off. They require us to do this for them. I know that, at this late date, we have had enough of them, yet, really, the problem is that no one ever told us how do to this. A man can neither incur nor pay any debt. We could do them a favour and offset it for them. We mustn’t allow them to confuse us with the two forms of accounting. Money of Exchange = substance based upon your labour which is real and Money of Account = just bookkeeping entries. All they need is our acceptance of their charges, our signature representing our authorization to access the treasury account, and then we instruct IRS/CRA, via tax forms, to handle the tax return.

Now that the public is using our credit, we ought to be compensated for it, right? It is our value they are using. Remember, they have no value themselves so they require ours. A line from A Course In Miracles reads: “Nothing ever leaves its source”. Since all value must return to source and close the circuit or ‘close the accounting’, when we are charged/billed, it is simply a request on the part of the public to set-off their charges for them. When it comes full circle, we will be compensated. How?

The latest is the 1099 OID, W9, 1040V and T5008, T7DR, depending upon where we operate in commerce … but it is still commerce, no matter where we are. Whatever value we personally have put into the public is against public policy; we were never meant to put our value into the public (since 1933), however since we did, it is 100% tax – dollar for dollar. Therefore, the corporation to which we gave it owes tax to IRS/CRA because it is withholding it and, if we don’t claim back our funds, they will keep it. The corporation will file a 1099 OID/ T5008 claiming that it is the source of the value and we now know that it is not – we are. If we do not file the correct forms with IRS/CRA in order to claim back that which we erringly put into the public, now IRS/CRA comes after us to pay the tax because, as it stands, it appears as if the ‘source’ of value was the corporation – because its filings indicate that. Since the tax must be paid and 100% of what we put into the public is tax, then someone has to pay, right?

If we have paid thrice for an item (1. the original credit to create it came from us, the principal, via our bond which pre-paid it (see my book); 2. the accepted return of their charge, indicated by our signature and social number; and, 3. cash/cheque/card, etc. aka ‘debt’ payment) when it ought to have been only the first two, then we are entitled to the return of the third – the cash. Unless we ask IRS/CRA for a “tax return”, it cannot balance its books and it will come after our labour (or compensation therefrom – i.e.: cash) in order for it to do so. So, we send IRS/CRA the forms identifying the correct source of the value which is we and not the corporation, and then IRS/CRA goes after them for ‘unreported income’ and 100% is returned to us, the principal from whom all credit came. These corporations, courts, etc. are all tax delinquents and in violation of public policy and the bankruptcy.

There can be NO “paying off” a public debt. The National Debt (which doesn’t really exist… well, it does, on paper, because the corporations USA, Inc. and CANADA, Inc. owe us, the shareholders – even though the media continue to lie, “Americans are in trillions of dollars of debt”. It is the corporations which are in ‘debt’ and this is because we continue to give them our debt notes/dollars and this increases the debt. See my book wherein I reveal that “working for a living” is only making the problem worse… for all of us. Paying a corporation with debt notes aka “dollars” only doubles its debt. One would think the board would not want this, yet, they want that debt because this provides them ammunition to get us to ‘pay’ more on the alleged national debt. But there can be no ‘debt’ because everything is pre-paid. The corporations couldn’t exist or operate unless we funded them in the first place with our credit via the bond via the Birth Certificate. Yet, if we “set off” public debt, we reduce the “national debt”.

Credit to them is debt to us and vice versa. Keep in mind that those at the bottom of the pyramid are trained not to know this because the top of the pyramid has been charged (by the world bank, the IMF) with extorting the labour and lives of those of us from whom they derive ALL their wealth in the form of dollars which is credit to those at the top. In other words, if we give them our value in the form of dollars, the corporation sees this as a debt – because it IS debt – and therefore has more debt to set-off, which is the way they want it because then they and their partners in crime, the feds and the banks, can call it the “national debt” which of course can’t exist, can’t be “paid”, and yet, can be set-off, however, the CEOs et al, perceive our dollars in the same way we do – dollars get us what we want.

Commerce is a mirror of what is true. Debt=credit for men and women, yet, credit=debt for corporations. It is crazy. If we continue to pay dollars when we are not obligated to do so, this makes our situation worse because we are giving debt to the public, ergo, the excuse to demand more dollars, and giving the people behind the fictional corporations the very thing we are intending to keep for ourselves and our families in order to acquire what we need and want. What an incredible scam! Remember, though, not paying might get us into trouble that we don’t personally want so, let’s have another do our fighting for us. Call in the IRS!!

All IRS/CRA wants, like any other corporation, is to balance their books and if we prevent this, by not filing properly, they come after us, which now makes sense to me. If we comply, by filing the proper forms for a return of all the labour we have put into the public which messed up their double-entry bookkeeping, we can charge (energize) IRS/CRA with securing our value from where we left it and return it to us, the principal and source of all value. And we wondered why they call it a “Tax Return”!  It is so they can return the tax to the principal because it is our credit the public has been stealing via filing false claims which is in violation of the criminal code (which is all based upon commerce… remember there are no laws as we think of them; all statutes, codes, etc. are commercial law) This is why corporations appear so wealthy when, in fact, in commerce, corporations cannot show a profit. (Their books must balance at the end of the day, just as the banks’ books must balance or the auditors would have a field day.) Huh?!?! They are the wealthiest “persons” on the planet. (remember the definition of “person” is “corporation” and “legal fiction”.) But it is the board members, not the corporation, who are wealthy. We have been letting them steal our labour and our lives!

Quite a concept, eh?  IRS/CRA truly do work for our benefit!  (We can go back 3 tax years and get back 100% of everything we have ‘paid’) All this time, we’ve been fighting them. As Winston says, “The IRS is my new best-friend.”

Money of Exchange (dollars) must NOT co-mingle with Money of Account (our ability to set-off public debt via acceptance and our signature). We cannot pay a debt with a debt and, yet, we do it every second of the day. We must accept their bills, return them with our signatures (the TRUE value) and the Treasury Account number (SSN/SIN) and, if vendors ask to be paid again, then, we honour them by giving them money of exchange (because we won’t be able to leave the shops without their thinking they have received something for the goods, even though we know that the goods are not for what we are ‘paying’ – we exchange payment for the receipt (see my book), yet, since ‘paying’ messes up their books – i.e.: doubles their debt – we handle this by having IRS/CRA get it back not only for us but also for all involved because it is a huge accounting error – not to mention, paying with cash is a crime. It only gets crazier, doesn’t it? This is why we will ultimately move into a cashless society! … for our benefit, not theirs, and to think that, for decades, I feared this ! Now I see that I am instrumental in its implementation.

Remember that anything we receive from the public – tickets, court orders, bills, etc. – is an OFFER and all we are required to do is ACCEPT it, sign it back to them so they can balance their books. Their accounting has nothing to do with ours (ie: cash) and if they intend to convince us that we are to give them our labour/cash, IRS/CRA is in the biz of getting it back for us. Corporations and courts don’t like this, however, IRS/CRA is designed to collect tax – nothing personal, its just business. They are the best collection agents in the world as they work for the IMF. It is their way of telling us that if we file, we get our tax returned. (Yes, people are already doing this).

Court:
I’ll say it again: Never go to court – unless you are dragged and if you are, your first questions ought to be, “What is your TIN? What is your authority? Where is the 1099 OID?  (meaning: Prove your claim to MY credit. Are you trying to trick me into suretyship?) If we ask the right questions up front, they can’t get past the fact that we are not going to give them anything; rather, we will file a 1099 OID/T5008, listing the true source of value, and get back that amount. Put the courts out of commission! Call out the IRS!

Collections:
When a collection agent calls, I ask for their Tax ID Number. If they won’t tell, I say, “That’s OK, what’s your address?  I’ll send you a W9/Request for TIN and if you fail to complete and return it to me, you will be subject to IRS/CRA fines and penalties. Then we will talk about how much YOU OWE ME for your unauthorized use of my credit.”

***

If you are interested in a interim, non-commercial, financial remedy to the imminent economic shift, go to: http://spiritualeconomicsnow.net/remedy/ and http://www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net/form1.html This is the easiest, fastest, fairest, most equitable, and most ethical way to get cash into your mitts without involving the banks’ control over our lives. In his book Stop Being a Victim, the author discusses the myriad of Internet and Home-Based Business Opportunities and concludes that a ‘One-Up’ program, such as the one I offer, is the only ‘biz-opp’ which is fair and equitable to everyone – not just those at the top. This activity began over 5 years ago and never a glitch … because it is private.

by: Mary-Elizabeth: Croft
Posted: July 18, 2008

For more of my latest and greatest articles, go to: www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net

For my book: How I Clobbered Every Bureaucratic Cash-Confiscatory Agency Known to Man –– A Spiritual Economics Book on $$$ and Remembering Who You Are
go to: www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net/solutions/How_I_06.pdf

The Authority Hoax

To: All those who think they have authority over me – agents of IRS/CRA, insurance, bank, government, and, in particular, cops:

I know you think you have authority over me. What has caused you to think this? The only possible answer is that someone, whom you believe to have authority over YOU, has told you that you have authority over another. In other words, because we are all created equal, in order for you to believe in a concept which is contrary to this truth, you must have been programmed to believe a lie. Whoever did so is not your friend. What is true is that, unless one Man grants to another his God-given authority, it is impossible for another to have it. No one would willingly, knowingly, or intentionally grant another Man authority over his property, his body, or his life. So, if you believe that someone has authority over you, it is because you have either willingly granted it or you have been deceived into granting it to him and if you believe you have authority over me, it is because you believe in a false concept. Accordingly, you must provide proof that you do, indeed, have true – not what you might have obtained against my will – but, true authority over me. If you can’t prove it; you don’t have it.

Birth Certificate (aka: BC)

No man or woman has a NAME or is a NAME. Men and women use a NAME. Men and woman act in capacity of principal of a NAME which is on all documents based upon the Birth Certificate – which is not to be used to identify any Man (man or woman). The BC is a bond which evidences a treasury account which was set-up for the use of the bearer of the BC. Until recently, the BC, which is evidence of the account has never served us; it has only caused government officials to hold us as surety for charges against the account and we did not know how to accept this suretyship to our advantage.

In 1933, after the 1929 Depression – instigated by the banks to threaten governments to pay their debts – governments were forced to declare bankruptcy. Yet, they pledged the future labour and productivity of the people in order to repay the interest on the loans. When we work for ‘pay’, it only appears as if we are compensated for our labour. (What’s true is, then, we exchange the cheque – a promise to pay – for debt so we were never compensated at all. The only thing that occurred is that the company which allegedly paid us got off the hook for having to pay tax on an asset – our labour. The paycheque is their way of getting out of tax – nothing else. We did not ‘get paid’.) The NAME which is ‘paid’, via either cheque or direct deposit is owned by the province/state to which our parents gave a NAME to be registered. They were tricked into allowing the feds to create an account which could be charged. Because the NAME is so similar to what parents called their child, everyone came to believe that the NAME on the account is the child. The entity which is ‘paid’, owns the bank account, the house, car, etc. is the NAME which is owned by the state/province. This is why we do not ‘own’ our houses - in the estimation of the banks, yet, we most certainly do own what we have because we were the ones who gave the credit to obtain it and we are in lawful possession of it.

Recently, I asked a bank manager, “Why were you so adamant about my providing you ‘government-issued ID’ in order for you to obtain the precise ‘name’ in which to open the account when, now, I see you’ve listed the account in a name which is nothing like the name on the passport?” She had no answer.

We can no longer pay our debts, hence, we can no longer create debt because no bankrupt entity (government) can make a lawful claim against us. So, these entities charge the NAME and convince us that we ARE that NAME, thereby making us surety for the charge and hoping we will be the one to pay the tax on the funds which ‘they’ create in order to pay back the banks. This is how we have become slaves. We MUST quit identifying with the NAME. All that is required of us, in order to obtain all we need and desire, is our signature so that the store/service can charge the account for credit to make another of whatever we just purchased, at no cost to us, because we already paid for it when the feds floated a bond against the NAME which never would have existed if our parents hadn’t allowed them to use it. This account was designed for OUR benefit. The feds would never take a chance on acting fraudulently so when we look at different ‘laws’ we see that they do not apply to us, they apply to the feds so that they will not take advantage of us. We all have experienced the bureaucrats’ violation of their own laws and we have all asked, “Where can we go for our remedy when courts, once designed for law and justice, no longer exist?” The only courts in existence now are commercial courts meant solely for the collection of revenue in order to pay the interest on the loans to the World Bank…. not to mention pad the judges pension. Fortunately, via the Uniform Commercial Code, we can now regain our control.

When we all learn what is truly going, we will no longer believe that we are the NAME on the summons, we can start asking questions of cops, registries, IRS/CRA agents, bureaucrats. What name are you taxing/charging? Prove I am that NAME. I don’t have a NAME and I am not a NAME. I use a NAME when I operate in commerce just as the CEO of SEARS uses that NAME in commerce, yet, he ‘is’ not that NAME. The CEO can’t be held liable if it is SEARS which is being sued. This is how we must begin to think. We can act as surety for the NAME as long as we have our ducks in a row. The latest on this is to have IRS/CRA to handle, for us, all charges against the NAME. It seems that this is what they were designed to do all along; we simply got tricked into paying things with “tax” (cash) without knowing how to get the “tax return” accurate so that the tax is refunded.

Several years ago I opted to get a CANADA PASSPORT. Since one is required to have a guarantor, I asked my chiropractor to be that (only professionals are trust-worthy – because only they have a licence which can be revoked if their statements are discovered to be false – the investigation of which only a government minion would do since they all come from a presumption that we are as deceitful as they are – talk about ‘projection’, eh?…. The woman in the cage (literally and figuratively) asked me if, when they rang my chiropractor to determine if I were the liar they clearly (and accurately) suspect themselves to be, would he know me by that NAME. I exclaimed, “Oh, no, actually, he would know me better as Mary …..” She said, “You can’t use two names!” “Oh, yes, I can! – as long as it is not with intent to defraud.” She never said another word.

Property

The Natives/Indians have always known that no one can ‘own’ anything which was granted us by our Creator. This means that NO ONE – including any ‘government’ can own air, water, or land OR control anyone else’s respectful use of them. Yet, all we hear about is people ‘buying property’. How did this occur?

We have been programmed to believe that we can own something by labouring for it and this simply isn’t true. The only reason we are labouring for the $$$ to ‘buy’ property is because we must compensate the previous Man who paid the previous owner from whom he ‘bought’ the property. The one who staked it out originally could have claimed it for his own use, yet, he fell for the scam of having to pay the government. Now that he has invested his labour, he most certainly wants that, plus a profit, from anyone who buys it from him… and so on, when, in fact, no one was ever required to labour to pay for something he will never own. We can only ‘use’ what Nature has to offer. We were never meant to labour for anything we need or desire and we were never meant to ‘earn our living’. We were GIVEN all we could ever need or desire and we have been conned into believing that someone else owns it and if we want it, we’ll have to labour for that which we already have a natural, Creator-given right to use.

If you were to investigate who owns your land, you would see the NAME under “Tenant”. We now know that the NAME is owned by the state/province. We cannot be a tenant, driver, defendant, operator, consumer, etc. unless we agree to be called that. This ‘agreement’, which is nothing more than the result of conditioning, programming, intimidation, duress, coercion, threat, etc., can only get us into trouble because we do not know who we are. All the years I worked as a registered nurse, when one would ask me what I did, I was careful to reply, “I work as a nurse”, not, “I’m a nurse”. We tend to believe what we are told and we must remain vigilant about how it serves others for us to fall for their programming. People still believe they want to keep their jobs and, in order to do so, they must do as they are told. They presume that a job is a good thing to have, yet, if they were to question that premise, they might see that it is fear which is prompting them to behave in unethical ways which do not serve their fellows so that they can get the almighty ‘paycheque’ which is not payable to them anyway; it is payable to the NAME.

When we labour, we are not compensated for it because we cannot play the Commerce Game. Only the NAME, which we have been conditioned to believe identifies us… that we are the name, gets paid for our labour. So, how do we get compensated for our labour? We don’t. Not at all. Never. What are we doing with our lives?! We were tricked into playing the Commerce Game because those who run the world require a slave-labour force and… they got it.

Courts

The courts are no longer courts of law and justice; there are courts of commerce – only. No case goes to court which is not about “money”. Everything changed in 1933 or so when USA and Canada declared bankruptcy. No bankrupt entity can have any commercial claim or charge against anyone or anything else. The banks insisted on being paid the interest on the loan so the feds, already having experienced the power of the banks – (the Great Depression was thrust upon us as a warning of how they could completely destroy nations) – so the President and Prime Minister acquiesced and agreed to declare bankruptcy and realized that since the gold was gone and the natural resources of the land had already been relinquished, the only thing left was the future productivity and labour of the people. So, they began to tax us at every conceivable opportunity. This is why, in case you were wondering, there are so many completely senseless charges with which they stick us for the fruits of our labour at every turn. They began to create ‘laws’ which are so totally absurd that they will be broken just in the very act of living life. There is not one law which applies to the people. Talk about having gotten out-of-hand and under complete control of the bankers who wish to enslave us via the alleged governments – which are not governments but private, foreign, belligerent corporations acting only as minions/puppets of the banks. Unless we practise saying, “NO! Not only NO, but HELL, NO!”, next year, we won’t have the chance.

Here is what most people – and almost ALL attorneys – do not know about courts:
1. Courts no longer have anything to do with the private disputes between men and women; they are for the purpose of collecting revenue only. ‘Charges’ are only a smokescreen to create debt money. There is no compensation for ‘victims’.
2. When we think we are summonsed to court, the NAME on the summons is not ours; we have not been called as ‘accused’ or ‘defendant’; they are simply letting us know that the account in that NAME has been charged and, since we have an interest in that account, we might want to mozy over to the courthouse to make sure they do not steal the credit of said account; But…
3. if we go to court, they will presume we are the surety for the charges because our very going to court grants them jurisdiction over us. We wind up in court only if we think that it is our name on the summons – it is not. Accordingly, we must learn to handle the ‘charges’ administratively prior to court; essentially give them what they want so that they don’t want our bodies. We can give them what they want via our signatures.
4. We never see the alleged charges so we must realize they do not exist; same goes with a warrant. They exist only after they have tricked us into agreeing to contract. ALL charges and warrants are Money Orders. They are created for the purpose of selling bonds on the securities market, yet, until they have our signatures – as the signature IS the money – they are ‘Counterfeit Securities’ which they sell on the securities market and then pull every trick in the book to threaten us into being the surety – the one liable for the tax payable every time debt funds are created. As long as we don’t sign or agree to anything, they are stuck with the liability which is why they threaten us with jail, fines, etc. However, if we can know that the charges were never directed towards us in the first place, we can avoid all this by forcing them to prove their case, which is impossible for them to do. You see how frantically desperate they are to continue to pay the interest on the debt which can never, ever be done, by the way, so, the sooner we make this game work for ALL of us, the happier we’ll all be. If this sounds like a contradiction, it is simply a matter of position – debtor or creditor.

We must be careful that our signature does not get us into a position of debtor to a contract - the terms of which they have dictated. We want to accept their offer of contract so that we can own it and then control it and then settle the matter. We must remain in control of these events. It seems the only way to do this is to have our paper in place prior to these events. Then we can bond everyone involved so they work for us. More on this in another article.

If our courts were not commercial and we still had courts where people could take their disputes and expect an impartial verdict, we could have a court with a jury OF ONE’S PEERS to adjudicate and discern if one must make amends. I am always amused by jurors who have absolutely nothing in common with either the plaintiff or the alleged defendant. How can we get jurors who are absolutely impartial? – by the agreement of both the complainant and the accused - NOT their attorneys. How simple is that?

Laws

The only thing you need to know about laws – codes, rules, regulations, statutes, by-laws, ordinances, constitutions, legislations, laws, bills, and acts – is that they have nothing to do with you. NOTHING! The USA and CANADA are corporations and have a Policy Manual just as SEARS has. Unless we work for SEARS, their Policy Manual does not apply to us. The proof is in the definition of the words used in said ‘laws’. Remember, legalese truly is another language. They have used English words, of which we believe we know the meanings, and changed the meanings for the sole purpose of deceit.

In Canada’s Interpretation Act, section 35 (1) … (US codes have an equivalent)
“person”, or any word or expression descriptive of a person, includes a corporation;
“includes” means: “confines within”. Legal Maxim Blacks Law Dictionary Revised 4th Edition 1968 Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius - The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. I finally got around to looking up the word ‘Canada’.
“Canada, for greater certainty, includes the internal waters of Canada and the territorial sea of Canada.” So, Canada is not land; it is water! It is also a corporation registered with the SEC in Washington, DC.

Peace Officers vs. Policy Enforcers

All Peace Officers ought to be apprised of not only the above but also what follows. They will soon discover that they have been deceived even more than we have. We have ALL been lied to – this means we are foolish, yet, it means they are foolish AND complicit. We are waking up to what’s true, yet, cops have more concerns. Not only have they been deceived, as we have, but also they are passing along, to us, those lies. Their conflict is showing up in their private lives – suicides and spousal abuse is four (4!) times the national average. They are now catching on that their jobs are not good for their souls. Their third hit will be that they stand to be punished, by themselves out of guilt, or by those whom they have injured, or by those whom they presently believe will ‘save’ them from punishment for their having been good minions and carried out their vicious orders. I remind them to remember Nuremberg Principle IV: “Subordinates who claimed, “I was only following orders” were also executed”.
“No man escapes when freedom fails; the best men rot in filthy jails. And those who cried ‘Appease,’ ‘Appease, ‘Are hanged by those they tried to please!” - Hiram Mann

They are compromising their ethics and integrity for a paycheque and the ‘privilege’ of keeping their jobs, yet, one Royal Canadian Mounted Police officer told me that he did not know ONE officer who wouldn’t quit his job tomorrow if he had a job elsewhere. So, what they are doing, day in and day out, is harming their fellow Man – not to mention their own families – for a paycheque today, which adds to their personal debt, and a pension they’ll never see, for performing tasks the repercussions of which they will experience. What we do to another we do to ourselves.
Its difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it. – Upton Sinclair

Peace officers are employed to serve the people; they swore an oath of office and oath of allegiance. Subsequently, they unwittingly subcontracted with the province/state – a private corporation – employed as “policy enforcers” for the purpose of revenue collection. Accordingly, they cannot lawfully act as a peace officer and a policy enforcer at the same time, such as they do in court. They cannot swear in as a peace officer and then testify as a policy enforcer. Since we can and will claim them as our witnesses to the facts, they will not be able to testify that the Traffic Safety Act, or any other ‘act’ applies to us. They cannot serve both employers at once.

A driver licence and car registration, plates, and insurance are required only by those operating in commerce – taxi, bus, and delivery drivers. The rest of us are riding in our cars for our pleasure – not business.

As a peace officer, acting lawfully for the people, they cannot file charges at all. As a policy enforcer they can charge only corporate entities, yet, corporations cannot contract. Hence, they must trick a Man into contracting, yet, they can do that only by creating joinder which requires their making a legal determination. They are then in violation of the law because they do not have a licence to practise law.

We are all equal under the law of nature. All other ‘laws’ are fictions. Man is not required to have ID, yet, public servants, i.e.: police, ARE – because they agreed to operate under these ‘laws’ – we did not. Accordingly, we can demand, respectfully, that they identify themselves via their badges, identification, social number, and business cards which reveal their risk management and their bond number. If they fail to produce, they can be criminally charged with ‘concealment’.

So, you see that police are in a very precarious position. It is lose/lose for them and the sooner they catch on and get out while they can, the happier they and their families will be.

WHAT!? Me Work?

We are slave-labouring for nothing. We are working for free; we do not get compensated. The NAME is what gets paid and, since the NAME belongs to the province/state, it is that which gets paid. If you think the funds in your bank account are yours, wait until IRS/CRA thinks you owe it. They could never steal from us as we could then charge the bank with theft so you must see that the account is theirs – not ours. The NAME on bank accounts, birth certificates, passports, property deeds, driver licences, etc. belongs to the province/state and as long as you think it is your name or that said name identifies you, you will be liable for any and all charges which have nothing to do with you. However, we now can accept all charges and settle them immediately. We now allow the public access to our exemption account, give them back the voucher/money order, and then apprise IRS/CRA that the public has used our credit and they can then get the funds in order to return them to source (us) in the form of a tax return - as long as we file the correct forms.

We can no longer afford to work. When one fails to “make ends meet”, he is tempted to correct the effect instead of the cause so he tends to get more work – which appears to create more income – rather than to work less which will, in fact, heal the cause. To make the problem of the Commerce Game disappear completely, we will have to quit “work” altogether and begin to do what we love and serve others by doing that. Unless you are working for yourself or your friend or your family, you are supporting corporations which are destroying our lives, our fellows, and our planet. Only the elite could come up with the concept of ‘slave-labour’ – such an ingenious way to control the masses. As long as we continue to “work”, believing we were meant to “earn our living”, we will not be free.

“The main reason people struggle financially is because in school they learned to work for money but never learned to have money work for them.” Robert Kiyosaki (Rich Dad, Poor Dad). My comment on that is, “and don’t think that wasn’t by design.”

You might well ask, what can one do in the meantime while others are catching on to the fact that slave-labouring for a corporation or government can only make the problem worse for ALL of us.

If you are interested in a interim, non-commercial, financial remedy to the imminent economic shift, go to: http://spiritualeconomicsnow.net/remedy/ and http://www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net/form1.html This is the easiest, fastest, fairest, most equitable, and most ethical way to get cash into your mitts without involving the banks’ control over our lives. In his book Stop Being a Victim, the author discusses the myriad of Internet and Home-Based Business Opportunities and concludes that a ‘One-Up’ program, such as the one I offer, is the only ‘biz-opp’ which is fair and equitable to everyone – not just those at the top. This program began over 5 years ago and never a glitch … because it is private.

by: Mary-Elizabeth: Croft

July 7, 2008

For more of my latest and greatest articles, go to:
www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net

This article and subsequent articles will ultimately be made into a book: Remember Who You Are; Remember Who “They” Are, a sequel to How I Clobbered Every Bureaucratic Cash-Confiscatory Agency Known to Man –– A Spiritual Economics Book on $$$ and Remembering Who You Are