Spiritual Economics Now

In an early episode of Boston Legal, a prosecuting attorney did his best to discredit a woman who, he said, was not as honest as she claimed because, when she was questioned by police, she reported one thing and, yet, here on the stand, she reported precisely the opposite. Immediately, I knew what she ought to have said and I was sorry the writers of the episode failed to see it. Rather, it would have cleared up something once and for all, but, it would have ruined many future episodes. The woman was under oath to state her truth on the stand, however, she was under no such obligation to say what is true to a police officer. There is no law against lying; it is done every second of the day in business, in families, in social situations and, it seems, lying is acceptable or, at least, not meant to hang upon anyone’s conscience. But, when we lie in commercial situations which involve the psychopathocracy* (coined by Dr. Kevin Barrett to describe the psychopaths in charge of the operation of our society - corporations, government, institutions, etc.), punishment awaits us. But this wasn’t the real problem.

The actual original problem arose from her having ‘talked with the police’ in the first place. They will ALWAYS use this against us, even if what we say is true and, in fact, if we have absolutely nothing to do with whatever they are questioning. “Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law” (as if there still exist any ‘courts of law’) means exactly that – it will be used AGAINST you. Cops NEVER say, “…can and will be used “in your favour” in a court of law.” So, this is proof enough: NEVER talk to the police… about ANYthing EVER, even when you are completely innocent. Don’t apprise them, teach them, explain anything (especially the ‘law’) … NOTHING!

As we all know about communications, with certain members of our families: “If you talk about anything more than the weather, you are wasting your time.” It applies here, yet, don’t even discuss the weather. We would be wasting our freedom. We are under no obligation to talk with them and, yet, they are under every obligation to answer our questions, simply because they are public servants, they work for us, they are at work and being paid during all this, not to mention court, and we are not being compensated for our time. We are NOT to waste our precious time and energy on them.

I flew to Toronto, recently, and was asked, by a man in some ‘official’ position, before I got to the “Security Checkpoint Charlie”, if I had any water bottles, gels, liquids, or lotions. I told him that the airline employees themselves tell us to drink more water whilst flying so, of course, I had water. He told me to dump it. I asked where I was going to get water to drink on board and he told me the water fountains on the other side (East Berlin). As long as I was in ‘West Berlin’, I could drink any sort of water I wanted, but passing through Checkpoint Charlie I was required to be waterless. It was then that I realized that I had failed to take my own advice which is, never say what is true to any “official” unless I had sworn to do so. I was under no obligation to do that.

So, I walked away, drank the remainder of my ionized, alkalinized, micro-clustered water and returned showing him my empty water bottle. I still had another water bottle in my bag and I was actually willing not to fly, over this matter, if I were challenged by ‘Security’. Along with my water bottle, I also had a bunch of “gels, lotions, and liquids” in my pack. I had consciously opted not to let them get away with this any longer. I was willing to call their bluff and, as they looked at my pack, I was ready to create a scene. If I were told I couldn’t take them onto the aeroplane, I was prepared to tell them to get my case out of the plane because I would not be flying and to march over to the airline counter to get a refund. I had it clear in my mind that it was not necessary for me to go to my aunt’s funeral.

No one said a word. I looked around me at all those who were taking off their shoes and all I could think of was the Nazi war films where we see people lining up to meet their death without even questioning it. Why didn’t these people at least attempt to flee? Surely, being shot was better than their probable fate! At every opportunity in dealing with these TSA (transportation security), I am very friendly and ask them about their jobs. Every single one KNOWS that his job is a joke. They look out from under their eyebrows at me and nod. It is a “make work” job. Those machines cost a fortune, for which we pay (if you scrutinize the contract for your air ticket, you’ll see the ‘security fee’ along with airport fees, departure fees, taxes, etc. listed; it is utter insanity.) We are paying, in most cases with our labour, to be humiliated. My suggestion is that we simply not take it any longer. I doubt it will take much. It is always a numbers game. CALL THEIR BLUFF.

“Name me a leader who has a better idea for homeland security than making us take off our shoes in airports and throw away our shampoo?” - Lee Iococca

Book a short flight, be willing to lose the cost, or better, pay for it with your signature in the first place, and put into your pack/carry-on as much contraband as you can, refuse to open your ‘laptop’ and to take off your shoes; in fact, I think we ought to refuse to go through the damn line at all. Anyway, make it work for you.

On another flight, a few years ago, someone wanted to take my nail scissors and I refused. I told them to call the airline and get someone over there asap and to get my case off the plane and put the scissors into my checked bag. Believe it or not they did it! Again, I was not going to stand for their nonsense. I admit I feigned crying and sobbed, “My mother gave me those scissors”, however, I was prepared to do whatever it took to prevail and I did. CALL THEIR BLUFF! They have absolutely no power until we give it to them VIA OUR CONSENT.

Bbe certain to see:

www.liveleak.com/e/b11_1212182183 and related videos.
I watched them four times. A man is driving on a highway in the middle of the desert in Arizona, I think about 30-40 miles from the Mexican border. He sees a STOP sign at Homeland Security with a bunch of state police cars and men in uniform. He is filming the entire episode. He opens his window just a crack, I suspect, and before the agent says anything, he asks, “Agent, what is your name?” She says, “What is your citizenship, Sir?” and here is how it goes: “Agent, what is your name?” “Sir, you need to tell me your citizenship.” “What is the purpose of the stop?” “What is your citizenship?” “Am I being detained?” “Are you an American citizen?” “Am I free to go?” “You need to state your citizenship.” “What is the purpose of this stop, Ma’am?” “Sir, I need your citizenship.” “Agent, what is your name.”

This goes on until she tells him to “pull over to the ‘secondary inspection’.” He never moves. He put down his camera which had snapped about 20 pics of all the other dozen or so agents who were there solely for the purpose of intimidating him. They also took photos of him on their cell phones. So, he had a video recorder and a camera and … only four (4) questions which he never stopped asking. After he sat there for a minute, without having moved over to “secondary inspection”, the agent said, “Sir, you’re blocking traffic; you’re going to have to move.” “Am I free to go?” “You are free to go. Leave this area, immediately.” As he said, and I paraphrase, “This is ONLY a show of force for purposes of intimidation to see who among us will obey and who among us know who we are.”

Notice he NEVER, EVER makes an assertion. NEVER does a statement escape his lips. *(I found this: www.liveleak.com/e/b11_1212182183 wherein he makes the statement: “I don’t need your permission.”) ONLY QUESTIONS! In particular, be sure to ask: “Who are you? What is your badge number? Do you have a business card to give me? What is your bond number? Who is your risk management?/bonding company?” My past incidents with alleged authorities flashed before my eyes and I immediately saw why I got into the trouble I did. It was because I made statements, thereby entering into a contract with them. For all of us who think we know more about commerce than most people and certainly more than the thugs with whom we are dealing, we must be VERY careful not to TELL them what we think we know. If they hear that we are willing to make a statement - of any kind, they will know that we are liable to make another statement and more than likely, about ourselves. Bingo! Contract! Its over for us. Then they know they can tell us what to do. It is mind-boggling when one finally gets how this works. As my friend, Gary, says, “The only two crimes in this world are ‘Being There’ and ‘Communicating’. Since we all know that ‘communication’ is the solution to almost everything, we hesitate to think that it is also the cause of most of our problems. Alleged authorities have the job of talking us out of our freedom and they see us as simply the catalyst for them to do so.

I talked with a friend who told me she had been arrested. I asked her what happened. She gave me some detail and told me that she told the cop, “I do not wish to enter into a contract with you.” Then she was in the back of a cop car. I asked, “How did that happen?” She gave me more explanation but seemed to skip over how she got from her car to the cop car. I asked again and she said, “He told me to get out of the car.” I said, “And you did? So, you contracted.” She truly had not seen that she had entered into a contract by obeying him. We must be so vigilant of this. Do not do anything they ask; do NOT “co-operate” because that “operation” in which we often “co - operate” is one which is against us, be polite but firm and only ASK questions. We have the ability to say, in the form of a question, anything we want to express. It is the question which changes everything. As questioner, we remain in control, we maintain our power, we remain the creditor, and, AS LONG AS WE ARE ASKING QUESTIONS, WE ARE INCAPABLE OF CONTRACTING. DO NOT CONTRACT!

For a cash solution without the abuse: www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net/remedy

June, Friday 13th, 2008

posted: www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net

********

American “election” and Canadian “bill”

I received an email from a woman, in the states, who claimed, “this is the scariest election in my lifetime.” Here is my response: You state this is a scary “election”.  There is no ‘election’. Not one corporation in the history of commerce has ever “elected” a CEO/President. CEOs are ALWAYS appointed. What makes you think the corporation called, “United States Government” is any different? The Board members will appoint Hilary, I suspect, who, incidentally, has renounced her US citizenship and is now a citizen of England. What does this tell you?  Corporations do not care about the citizenship of their CEOs. Why would they, as long as the CEO is qualified to do the job that the Board expects of them? 

This situation has no more to do with you than whom the Board of Directors appoints as the next CEO of Sears. Please do not spend one more second thinking about this corporation. What you see on TV is simply to keep you from thinking about what you ought to be thinking about in order to run your life. As long as you give this dreck and arrant nonsense your attention, the Board has control of your mind.

The people and country of America have not had a government in 75 years. Ergo, the people have not had a President to lead said country. This cannot be the “scariest election of your lifetime” because, in your lifetime, you have never witnessed ANY election, never mind a scary one.

Accordingly, I’ll bet that MOST of the people in the states want Ron Paul to be President of the government of said states, however, since this office simply does not exist, there is no possible way he can prevail.

***
When, do you guess, are the people of the provinces going to ‘get’ that they are not “Canadians” and that any “bill, law, statute, ordinance, by-law, constitution, legislation, code, rule, regulation, act” of Canada does not apply to the people - only to Canadians, i.e.: those who are employed by the corporation, Canada?

If you have a friend who works for Sears, he is obliged to read the Sears Policy Manual. In it, he discovers a policy which reads, “Sandals are not to be worn at any time.” You agree to meet this friend on Sunday for a walk in the park. You turn up wearing sandals and he tells you that you are not allowed to wear sandals. After you pull your eyes back into your skull, you ask what makes him say that. He pulls out his Sears Policy Manual and points to the section which reads, “Sandals are not to be worn at any time.” You are stunned that your friend could be this stupid and so, you explain, “That has nothing to do with ME; I don’t work for Sears; YOU do. YOU agreed to this policy; I didn’t. What makes you think that the policy of any corporation has any power over anyone other than those who have agreed to abide by it?!  i.e.: an employee. I am not an employee of Sears.”  Will he ever get that it is alright for you to wear sandals?  I wonder. Most of us are NOT employees of Canada, or Alberta, or BC, etc. Most Americans are NOT employees of United States of America or its subsidiaries. The policies of those corporations do not apply to us, the people of the provinces/states.

Pursuant to this latest and greatest “Bill C-51” which, BTW, can be accepted, owned, controlled, and set-off, by us:
What we resist persists.
If we just ’allow’ it, we will dissipate its energy and then, from a higher
vibration, we can create what we want.
As long as we are at the same vibration/energy level that this is, we’ll only create more of it because to whatever we give our attention and energy, we increase.
By our fighting what IS and our not asking ourselves how we want something to be, instead, we will be left with things the way they are.

As it stands, you people who are fighting this Bill C-51 (whilst Bill C-52 is much more daunting) are energetically holding it in place - right where the psychopathocracy* wants it. You are supporting psychopaths. (see the flick: The Corporation) Are you certain that this is what you want to do?
I suspect that you have been emotionally caught up in this and those of you in the health field think it is up to you to DO something about it. I know we all have to do what we believe we have to do, yet, doing something about anything proves you believe it is real. Complete detachment is what will grant us peace of mind because it proves that we can roll with whatever ‘appears to be’ and that we know we are above it all - because we are. The psychopathocracy is dragging you into their nonsense because they require your emotional energy - fear and anger - which is what they need to propagate their agenda. You fell for it. 

* Dr. Kevin Barrett – to describe the psychopaths in charge of the operation of our society - corporations, government, institutions, etc.

The way to observe this is: ”Good news; bad news… who knows?” This is the Zen Buddhist manner of assessment because the truth is, since none of us has the entire picture, none of us knows what the outcome will be, yet, we do know that giving something our attention makes it real for us. Question whether this is truly something you want. 

Once upon a time, the people in a particular part of Holland collectively refused to pay tax to the Romans  – a corporation – and so the Romans went home empty-handed – not having acquired jurisdiction over the people who did not volunteer to give it. The people did not hand over their authority to the Romans via elections and they had no fear of the Romans. Without the consent of the people, the Romans had no authority over the people and so departed. The people knew who they were.  They knew they are the creators of wealth and that Rome – a thing – is not. The Romans intended to confiscate their assets via fear and intimidation, yet, the people had no fear and thus did not submit to any authority outside themselves. People do not need government; government needs people. No government can exist without people yet people can most certainly live very well without government. Things, such as government, corporations, banks, do not produce wealth because they cannot. They are, however, an expense to the people who do. We are not about protesting taxation, or government, or laws, or anything else; we are about Truth and the freedom which comes from knowing it. 
 
A evil man was holding captive a little girl. He told her that he had put into a cloth bag a black stone and a white stone from the path along which they were walking. If she chose the white stone from the bag, she could go free, however, if she chose the black stone, she would remain with him. She put her hand into the bag, pulled out a stone, and promptly dropped in onto the path. It was lost among the other stones. She appeared regretful and then put her hand into the bag and pulled out a black stone. She said, ”Since the black stone remains in the bag, the stone I chose must have been the white.” Of course, he had put two black stones into the bag and yet, due to her cleverness, he was forced to free her. We must develop this cleverness if we are deal with tyrants.

When I was young, my father was adamant that I remain safe walking to and from school. He told me, “Play a game. If you see a car coming, pretend it is trying to hit you and get to a place where it can’t.” I suggest we all do the same: play a game; pretend that the media, the corporations, the alleged ‘governments’ are all trying to hurt us – or at least trick us – and put ourselves into a state of mind where they simply cannot affect us.

The answer to all our alleged ‘problems’ is to change our minds about who we think we are. We must begin to operate at a level of consciousness which the psychopathocracy simply cannot attain. If they could attain it, they could not survive there. They would either die or be forced to change what they are doing. 

Best of Eckhart Tolle: http://spiritualeconomicsnow.net/mp3files/Stillness1.mp3

The only winning move is not to play. – from the movie, War Games. We must remove ourselves from their game. We cannot expect to know what that will look like while we are still playing. How can we expect to see the entire picture when we are seeing it from inside the frame?  We must move to a higher level of energy where tyrants and psychopaths cannot survive. Then, everything will change. If we are not willing to take a chance on our faith in Who We Are then we will lose, through our fear.

Since “we do not know what anything is for” (from A Course In Miracles) let’s take another perspective on this matter. Since the ‘government’ appears to be the parent treating us as if we are children, let’s try this on for size. What if it is playing the game of “tough love”? I’m not saying it is, I’m only taking a look from another perspective. What if their job, as ‘public servants’ is to provoke us into standing up for ourselves? I am reminded of a time, 6 years ago, when I was working as a Registered Nurse, and I heard a nurse mention how outraged she was about “Alberta Health is no longer going to cover…..” whatever the treatment or procedure happened to be. Another nurse was equally exasperated. I said, “This is good news!” They both looked askance at me. I explained, “This means that it is even more likely now that the people of the province will catch onto the fact that they cannot rely upon Alberta Health to keep them healthy or even be their catalyst back to good health. We are left on our own to take responsibility for our state of health.” They didn’t like what I said, but that is only because their livelihoods depended upon serving the genocidal pharmaceutical industry and not their patients, yet, relying upon oneself, as opposed to a commercial agency, is, without question, a safer place to be – always.

This applies to any and all codes, rules, regulations, laws, statutes, acts, bills, ordinances, by-laws, constitutions, and legislations. We cannot rely upon them one way or another. We cannot expect them to assist us and we cannot allow them to thwart us – whether it be concerning our health, wealth, love, or peace of mind.

June 1, 2008

See my other articles on my blog: www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net
1. The Authority Hoax
2. Notice to Canada Employees
3. the 144,000
4. Rick Simpson’s video, “Run from the Cure”, about Hemp Oil

*** For a NON-COMMERCIAL SOLUTION to our financial woes, go to: www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net/remedy

How I Clobbered Every Bureaucratic Cash-Confiscatory Agency Known to
Man……A Spiritual Economics Book on $$$ and Remembering Who You Are
www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net/solutions/How_I_06.pdf