Spiritual Economics Now

If you have a trip of 100 km. (pronounced:  KIL’ o-meters) (62 miles), and you travel at 120 kph (75 mph) which is acceptable, in a 110 (70) ‘speed zone’, you will arrive 50 minutes later.  If you increase your speed to 130 kph (80 mph), you will save 4 min.  Unless it is the difference between catching and missing a train, the potential loss is vastly greater than the win.  That speed will definitely cost you in gas and will possibly cost you in: safety, delay by the cops, and fines. Four minutes is not worth all that.

Now, multiply your trip times 4, i.e.:  400 km. and drive 120 (75), you will arrive 3:20 later.  If you drive at an increased speed of only 10 kph (6 mph), i.e.: 130 (80), you will save only 15 minutes. Over a time of 3 hours, 15 minutes is negligible and, hence, just not worth it, considering that you also increase the likelihood of being stopped by the cops, and the consequences of a potential mishap.

With several provincial and state parks, along the route, where the “speed limit” is 90 (55), a 400 km. (248 mi.) trip will take you 4:26.   If you consider that 120 (75) is still an acceptable speed, then the 3:20 trip means you would save over an hour. That is dramatic but what is even more dramatic is that, almost certainly, you will get stopped by a cop, or become very dangerous to either you or someone else, because the posted speed of 90 (55) MEANS that the conditions –wildlife, construction, or roads– are such that going any faster WILL create a problem.  I hit a deer a few years back and not only did it wreck the front of my car but also it so upset me, I had to stop for a half-hour. Had I been speeding, the situation would have been even worse. Also, consider that you cannot maintain that 120 (75) speed in those zones, simply due to those conditions. Ergo, you will not save yourself the hour, no matter what. However, the fines are egregious, the potential loss of life becomes frightful, and just being stopped by a cop will cause you to lose about ½ the time of your anticipated saving.  So, it simply is NEVER worth it to speed.

The MOST IMPORTANT reason not to speed is:  the cops WANT you to speed.  We all know that they don’t give a damn about our safety; they care about collecting revenue, getting promotions, and making us miserable.  Since they have abandoned their role as Peace Officer and their true purpose, which is to protect us, we ought to have nothing to do with them.  They have no right to stop us unless they witness a breach of the peace, so, for ALL our sakes, please do not ‘make their day’ by speeding.  It is NEVER worth the short-lived, only slightly possible saving of some time. Take along some tunes, or an audible book, or a friend and enjoy the ride.

Make the cops miserable. This is the best way to do it.  I thank you and your family thanks you.

…

Since it seems –at least so far– as if we are unable to remove ourselves from this insidious Commerce Game, we might as well play it so that it hurts ‘them’.  We live in a world of commerce and, if there is no getting out of it, then, the only way to survive this is to do to them what they do to us:  charge them up the yin-yang.

Dean Clifford has given his final lecture on his “game-ending” information:

The Three Entities: the man; the Trust; and the Officer of the Trust who can authorize and off-set charges, i.e.: handle the accounting, and he has an residence, aka address of a branch-office of the corporation, e.g.: CRA. The Officer has no rights whilst he performs a function of government, for which he ought to be paid. Any charges against the trust would be handled by the officer but he is not personally liable for any fees, fines, etc.  So, occupying the position of officer, as long as we are not held personally liable and as long as we get paid to do the job, which they intend us to contract to perform, is alright. The same man can hold different capacities.  They want the all-cap last name, John Henry DOE, to show up as officer, but we can’t mix jurisdictions, i.e.: we can be either the man OR the officer, but not both at the same time.

What seems to have some clout is a Fee Schedule –itemizing all the things which they might want us to do for the trust and the costs, along with a mention that failure to settle promptly may result in Civil Court action / Commercial Lien, along with a note:  “You can force me to do anything, but you can’t force me to do it for free, as that would be slavery, which has been outlawed internationally, via Article 4 of the UDHR. Since all this is about commerce, and not justice, then, before I, John Henry Doe, perform as the officer/trustee, John Henry DOE, of the DOE, JOHN HENRY Trust, there is the matter of my fee which is $50,000 an hour, or any part thereof, and, if I am required to go to court in order to handle the accounting, then, the fee is $100,000 an hour, in advance. Upon my receipt of said payment, I shall (pay a fine/appear in court/file for a tax return, whatever).  If you don’t like my terms, then hire someone else for the job.  Please send payment to: Name ? address.”

We ARE in ‘their’ system and so, if they want to force us to do something, then it will cost them and, just like any other contract, there are terms and, if the terms are too steep for them, they are free to end the negotiations and renege on the contract. In other words, we ought to make it so that THEY do not want to contract with US, rather than vice versa.  Since the only language they speak is force, contract, and money, this might be the best way to handle them: treat them as they treat us.

Dean told the story of his brother who was pursued by police, but didn’t stop. Since he had a “Fee Schedule” in place; i.e.: he had sent it to the cop shop, suddenly, the cop came to a screeching halt and turned around. Clearly, the cop had ‘googled’ the plate, as they do, and read the warning, “DO NOT STOP”. When our hero got home, he called the sergeant and told him, “One of your goons tried to stop me. You DO know that if I had stopped, it would have cost you $200,000.”  After some muffled comments, the sergeant said, “I don’t want to continue this conversation.”

I carry my fee schedule in the car and figure if a cop stops me, I’ll just tape it to the window so this is ALL he sees. The threat of Commercial Lien ought to get their attention, if the “Fee for being stopped”, in the amount of $250,000, doesn’t.

Dean claims that, on the back of the BC, it reads, “For Treasury Use Only”, so if we use the BC, either we ARE the Treasury and so we are liable as surety, or we are NOT the Treasury and so we are acting in fraud.  Use of the BC is only to prove the existence of the bond, the value of which will handle all liability for that Trust. Our use of the BC as ID for anything, such as application for DL, passport, etc., would be relinquishing our rights –particularly, our right not to contract.

One might want to warn the Court, in advance of any hearing, “If I am dragged to Court, I’ll hand the order to the Crown and I’ll charge you $100,000 to do it”, so that if one were to find himself in front of a judge/administrator, against his will, then he can say, “This court cannot proceed, as there is an outstanding bill before the court.”

Dean’s approach in response to a judge’s order is,  ”Is this an order?  Well, as soon as I get paid –because I don’t work for free any more than you do– I’ll be sure that it gets carried out.”  After getting the cheque (do not allow the court to proceed until the matter of payment is settled), we can hand the order to the prosecutor and say, “You hold legal title to the name of the trust; you’re the trustee; here; handle this.”  Then we can say to everyone present, “I just got paid $100,000 to walk over to the Crown attorney and hand him his order.”

Conclusion: For so long we made a distinction between only two names.  The distinction must now be made among three names.  Keep that in mind.

…

Ridiculous Ritual:  Daylight Saving Time

DST is not “Daylight Savings Time”, as in Savings Accounts or Savings and Loans.  There is no “saving” of daylight. It comes and goes every day and we cannot hang onto it or save it to use at a later time.  I told a friend I’d see him at 4 PM, i.e.: 4 hours post meridian, i.e.: 4 hours after noon.  I quickly added, “I don’t change my clocks, so that’s 4 on my clock but likely it is 5 on your clock if you are obeying GCT.  He asked, “What is GCT?”  and I told him Government-Control Time.  I am always a bit surprised by those who tell me that they are sovereign, know who they are, not run by the government, etc. and then go and change their clocks from natural sun-time to what the government tells them is the time.  They ought to re-read the book, “1984”:  “How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?”  “What time is it, Winston?”

The controllers’ main game is to disorient us from nature which is from where we derive our power and recollection of our omniscience. They are determined to undermine the value of the sun and nature, and force us to believe that the sun has either a bad impact on us and, ergo, the need for sun-block or chem-trails– or no impact on us at all –by telling us that the sun is not overhead when it is. Nature would beg to differ about the value the sun has on us, but if we got “back to nature”, we could be re-trained in all our natural talents; but the controllers can’t have that.  Don’t let them tell you what time it is when it is contrary to what nature indicates.  Only a bureaucracy can make up the idiocy that taking an hour away from the sunlight of the morning  and adding it onto the sunlight of the evening will give us an extra hour of sunlight. They are morons and their intent is to mess with our natural inclinations and instincts, just as they have messed with the natural patterns of all other animals. Quit letting them do so.

PS:  Midnight is 12 MN and Midday is 12 Noon.  At noon, the sun is directly over the meridian and so it can be neither ‘ante’ nor ‘post’, i.e.: neither AM nor PM.  12 AM would be 12 hours Ante-Meridian, i.e.: midnight, and 12 PM would be 12 hours Post-Meridian, which is also midnight.  So, please learn that 12 can be either MN or Noon, only.  The alternative is to learn the 24-hour clock.  There is no 12 AM or 12 PM.  They are meaningless.

Ridiculous Clichés:

1.   “I want to share with you….”

A fellow actually said to me, “I want to share with you something terrible that happened to me…..”   I said, “Well, if it’s already occurred and I wasn’t there to experience it WITH you, and I was NOT, then how can I “share” it with you; and why would you WANT me to ’share’ your terrible incident?  Because misery loves company?  ”Sharing it with me” is not only an absurd concept but also a malicious one!” Maybe what you are saying is that you want to TELL me about it, not “share” it with me.

2.  “Do you see the glass as half full or half empty?” What a stupid question!  If one is filling the glass and it is half-way, then it is half-full.  If one is drinking from or emptying the glass and it is half-way, then it is half-empty.  This has absolutely nothing to do with one’s attitude towards anything.

3.  ”Absolute” describes degree; it is neither affirmative nor negative. So, when someone says, “absolutely” in response to my question, I ask, “Do you mean absolutely NOT or absolutely SO?”

…

Often, I receive emails which begin with “Must See” and, after watching an attached video, I realize that I didn’t need to see it, at all. However, I received a batch of videos –three of which I have now heard (the Name is the Mark of the Beast, Ben Lowrey’s interview, and part 5D - Intel Agents) — and am wont to advise that we ‘Must Hear’ what Arthur Christian has to say.

The ‘Beast’ is the ‘System’ and the ‘Mark of the Beast’ is the ‘Name’;

The “System” is religions, professions, politics, media, schools, banks, etc.;

The ‘System’ is ‘THEIR’ world;

The Name is the ‘Mark of the Beast’;

Everything is the ‘Intellectual Property’ (IP) of the Crown;

The Name is the IP belonging to the Crown and we must not use it;

We have been made “processors of curses”;

They administer titles (IP) not substance (Don’t confuse the menu with the meal) and they administer us, the sinners and processors of curses;

We must return the curses to the ones who created said curses;

When we ‘own’ anything (’own’ means to believe) so, if we have a belief in or if we ‘own’ anything, i.e.: the IP, we are controlled.

The NWO will be the controllers’ answer to our complaints of their corruption. Same coin, different side.

I am answerable to no one;

I am ‘live’ and do not process the curses of their ‘dead’ world;

I hereby return, to them, their curses;

What I have written in the past seems truer than ever:

If we are not part of the solution, we are part of the problem;

No solution TO commerce can be found IN commerce;

A ‘win’ within the System is not a win;

The only way to win is not to play.

The Name is the Mark of the Beast:

http://www.youtu.be/DdOag66v7uo

ps:  ”decimate” means:  ”to reduce BY one-tenth”, not “to reduce TO one-tenth”.  ”Decimate” is not too serious. It does not mean “to destroy”.  ”Annihilate” means to destroy.  Yes, ‘decimate’ is yet another word the controllers have used to manipulate us. They have dictated that we now believe that it means “to destroy completely”.

Ben Lowrey interviews Arthur Christian:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iH25tucSZSo&feature=related

“The Dream Of Life“ Part 5A, 5B, 5C & 5D

System Science is Fraud and the Timeline of Chaos

Part 5A: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ej0mCoMjRrY

5B: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TgKkTqwPPQ

5C: http://www.youtu.be/Rucn4YXOYDo

Images Of Deception - The Intelligence Agents Amongst Us

Part 5D: http://youtu.be/KgEwY38JQWU

“The Dream Of Life“

Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5O-S6wFgts

Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOHTJpWcH-4

Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGwxAk4mAPU

Part 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6irTeSZtP4s

————————–

Arthur’s comments:

“The Dream Of Life” video series on the YouTube Channel:

http://www.youtube.com/user/ArthurLoveForLife

or go here: www.loveforlife.com.au/node/8235

After we have completed the “Dream Of Life” video series, our intention is to create a professionally made documentary covering the body of this work. Also, everything we, the Cristian family, have gone through, from bank fraud and the theft of the family home to death threats and attempts on Arthur’s life, is documented in the blog.

The Dream Of Life Part 5A, 5B, 5C -  System Science is Fraud and the Timeline of Chaosis about the way the belief systems of “The System” trap us in “The System” so that we can learn how to recognise how we give our power away and let our lives be ruled by others. This is how we learn to extricate our lives from “The System” so that together we can co-create lives of freedom, truth, peace, joy, abundance & do no harm for all of life without loss of uniqueness or having slaves & rulers. We discuss many of the tools of the Freemasonic/Satanic world used to brainwash us and keep us under their spell. Their spells are intellectual property that are demons that possess us, keeping us trapped in “The System”. We are taught to create other worlds/realities by putting our energy into self fulfilling prophecies that we have been brainwashed into worshipping. This is how we become slaves. We create the outcomes that we have been taught to believe in, like actors being given their roles in a play. The stage for our lives is set through our brainwashing. Also discussed are the New World Order, the next version of “The System”, and how to spot its leaders and tacticians, the flaws in the message they spread and the consequences of falling for their message. As this video has got very long, we have divided it into four parts. These include many pictures and extracts from YouTube videos, as well as text and us talking.

The Dream Of Life Part 5D - Images Of Deception - The Intelligence Agents Amongst Us - “We Will Lead Every Revolution Against Us”. This video discusses the importance of images in maintaining control of our thinking and how we use our power of life to set these images in motion. We also discuss the heavy infiltration of intelligence agents in just about every area of “The System”, placed so that they are aware of and able to control every “movement” occurring in “The System”, whether religious, environmental, political or other. We show how to quickly rout out the deceivers that work together, reporting to their masters, to prevent us ever escaping our enslavement to “The System” and creating the lives we dream of.

Large organic recycled transportable garden

http://youtu.be/PBqAV9n3XmQ

…

Perhaps the hardest concept we might have to face is that the system was never designed for our benefit. It has taken me awhile to get that through my skull, for certain. I guess we still judge others by our own standards of ethics and we presume that no one would deliberately set up a system of finance which is so damning and which could so injure us. People to whom I would otherwise credit with intelligence are still saying, “there is nothing wrong with the system, only the people operating it.”   The system was likely set up to ‘appear’ as if it were for our benefit, and likely even ‘reads’ as if it is for our benefit, however, it is not for our benefit; it is for their benefit only and they very adroitly constructed this fraud, literally to steal our spirit, our freedom, our value, our peace of mind, and our lives.  I feel as if I have come full circle as this is what I wrote in my book and I have done my best to repudiate it; alas, to no avail.

It seems as if our being the General Executor/Beneficiary is incidental when we do not have an army to back us up.  As accurate as that concept might be, it is doing us no good. The same can be said for Quantum Language. Until we have the military on our side, I doubt we can enforce it.  I no longer care about trusts or estates or who is the GE or the Trustee or the Beneficiary or whether a sentence reads like a palindrome or not.  Like everything else we’ve ever come up with—so what?  What matters is their fraud, dishonour, deceit, and vicious cruelty by which they deliberately bonded us into slavery.  The very instant that our parents were handed the Statement of Birth was the beginning of their intent to defraud us. I thought that the deception might have begun after this –between the Registration of the Event of the Birth and the BC– but, no; the trickery, entrapment, deception, and fraud all began with their coercion of our parents to sign that document.  There appeared to be benefits for their having done so –baby bonus cheques, schooling, etc. but there is none.  They stole our name and all the value which goes with it.  We were bonded into slavery and the BC is evidence of that.  If we return the evidence of their ownership of the Name to the Crown who owns and controls it, we render, null and void, the bond and, ergo, the value they get from us. I suspect that this is what is making them angry. Where, until now, our antics have been ignored, this seems to have aroused their ire.

Since they can interact with only dead entities, then giving back the birth/death certificate– that which declared us ‘dead’ (everything is backwards in their world of fiction) then, they no longer have control over us, the living. They have control over dead entities and if we are the holder of the BC —or any document derived from that— it evidences that we are dead.  As Kate says, when we return the BC, then we are born again. We are giving up the certificate which has made us dead to them. They have no authority or jurisdiction over the living man.

Using a name which is not ours is ‘impersonation’, which is fraud. This is why the most important thing to them is to get us to admit to being the name.  I heard recently of a fellow, in court, who said to a clerk after she called the name, “Are you calling the man or the person?”  After she called it again, he repeated that and, after she called it a third time, he said, “The man is here, if you’re calling a man; but the person is not here.”  Apparently, they all walked away and he went home.  I love stories like this. It shows us that their game is all about the Name.

Maybe, anyone in court who admits to the name, albeit via coercion, threat, deceit, trickery, intimidation, or force, is admitting to ‘fraud’ and at this point, the Crown/Court has a legitimate crime by which to charge us. So, this is why I have maintained my position on NEVER GO TO COURT !  Our mere ‘appearance’ means that we believe ourselves to BE the Name or, at the very least, to have USED it in circumstances under which we had no right to do so, which has led to our self-incrimination. Since all crime is commercial and “fraud” is most certainly commercial, as it is ‘profit by deceit’, then maybe ‘fraud’ is the only crime there is.  Since their entire system is about ‘money’, then it stands to reason that everything they claim is a crime simply reverts back to only ‘fraud’.

Maybe ‘fraud’ is the only ‘charge’ they can use against us and, conveniently, no one ever says so.  Had anyone ever charged us with ‘fraud’ we would have asked, “Whom did I deceive?” Remember, we are never, ever charged with any ‘crime’ UNTIL we admit to being the Name.  It is always the name which is charged and, if we claim to BE that, then it is we who are charged.  Where we thought that the name was only the means they ‘use’ to charge us, it now seems that admitting to the name might just be the crime itself. Everything after that is just the proverbial “dog and pony show”, i.e.: meaningless.

Kate says that even encouraging someone else to use what they believe to be their own name is “enticing fraud” and this includes the thugs; so, do not ask a cop, judge, attorney for his name.

Stay tuned. I sense this will all play out and prove to be true. Right now, I am just watching, but it sure makes sense to me.

For Kate’s information,

go to:  loveovermind.wordpress.com

see Kate’s (Katherine of Gaia) document:  Denique Ultimatum

also, listen to past interviews:  http://emesowum.com/kt/interviews/

…

A few days ago, I posted an article about Kate — formerly Keith Thompson of the “Judge Bows to Sovereign” video.  My purpose was to present Kate’s position on yet another possibility on how to become free. I posted it prematurely as I think it is important to wait and hear about the results from the people who have already sent Kate’s document, Denique Ultimatum (DU),   loveovermind.wordpress.com to the City of London, State et al.

I hear there have been repercussions; maybe because the DU accuses the thugs of fraud and they don’t like that. Or, maybe because they really are not acting fraudulently, however, I contend that when there is a deliberate and vicious withholding of full disclosure, it might not be ‘fraud’ but it IS ‘bad faith’.  The good news is that this means that the DU must have some clout as they feel threatened.  The bad news is that the thugs are retaliating. Because the premise of the DU document is that we “lose the name and win the game”, and that the name is theirs, not ours, it is possible that they might opt to steal our cash from ‘their’ accounts.  Most of us are not ready for that, yet.

It seems there are two camps:  those who believe the system can be corrected—if only we get the corrupt thugs out of the way, based upon the concept that the system was designed to work for our benefit; and, those who believe the system cannot be corrected because the corruption has gone past the point of no return. I contend that the design of the system must be flawed or their corruption could not have penetrated it in the first place, and so it must be dismantled and replaced by something better. Frank O’Collins is hard at work on a superior system. In the meantime, do we get out or suffer through it?

Kate claims that our parents sold the name and, ergo, us, into slavery. True, on the Statement of Birth, we read “Given Names” and, yes, our parents ‘gave’ us a name, but the instant that this document was handed over to the public, our ‘name’ was no longer private. What the thugs seem to have done with the name is why we must remove ourselves from it.  The instant that our parents cashed the first baby bonus cheque, the contract was deemed ‘accepted’.

One might argue that the contract was between the province and our parents—not us,  however, we simply assumed it and carried on, not only by signing the Name but also by making use of a Name which, for only a few hours, had been solely ours. If the Crown, via the Province, owns the Name, then, our using someone else’s property, without permission and for profit, is fraud. It is not ours to use and, if we do, we can be fined, charged, and arrested for ‘fraud’. Another tactic would be to force them to prove that we ARE a name, yet, I’ve noticed that we seem unable to get anything from them, including the courtesy of a response.

Dean’s position is that the registration of the birth simply allows the public to know of our existence so that an estate can be created for our benefit. If we insist that the public use our name in “inherent rights” and not “statutory” jurisdiction, then it is their duty to protect our inherent rights and our property. But, it seems the public has never done so, and likely never will, so the next step is either to sue them or to file commercial liens against them.

Frank carries this one step further and claims also that the registration of the name is the establishment of the estate of which our parents are the General Executor (GenEx) and we are the beneficiary. But, he adds that once we come of age, we are to establish that WE are now the GenEx and our failing to do so means that the estate is abandoned property and the public simply takes over that role from our parents.  We ought to have corrected this when we reached age 21/18, by drawing up a Last Will and Testament and then notice the Public of both the Will and the Appointment of us as GenEx.  At this point, the Name is still the name of an Estate of which we are still Beneficiary, yet, now, we have become the GenEx.  No one else can act as either, so the public trustees remain Trustees and cannot charge the estate without our authorization. So, unless we consent to their charges, about which we must remain vigilant, there can be none.

I still say, never go to court, as our mere appearance is interpreted by them as our admission to being the name.  If, as Dean says, we win our case before we go to court, then it is alright, however, it is also a ‘why bother?’  It seems, though, that the way to win before going to court is to let the court know, via the two notices — of the ‘Will’ and the ‘Appointment’, that we will be coming to court as the GenEx.  Maybe they’ll get the hint that our appearance will be a lose/lose for them.

As Dean says, the name of the player is not important; rather, it is his ‘position’ in the game that matters.

…

I was just about to post an article on the information I obtained from Dean when, lo and behold, I received a link to his seminar of November 19, 2011.

Straight from the horse’s mouth:  http://www.time4thetruth.info/

Thanks to Phil Thompson, here is the equivalent for those in the states:

The constitution is the american version.

…

I thought of all the court cases, cop stops, and horror stories I had ever heard, witnessed, or experienced and, as I put them all together in my mind, I asked, “What’s the answer to all this tyranny?”  My answer came as a picture.  I then rummaged through my memory to discover that the vision was a scene from the movie, “Mystic River”.  For the answer to “Why all the tyranny?”  watch the first 6 minutes (below).  That’s all you need to see to get the message.

How did this happen?  Family, school, doctors, churches, etc. are institutions set up by ’society’, all for the purpose of “programming”, via disciplining.  Only a few of us have any true personal choice based upon our self-respect, probity, and wisdom.  “Free will” is the most valuable trait of our humanity, yet, it is essentially nipped in the bud before we have even had time to consider the concept.  By age 7, we are programmed for life.  The longer we stay in school, the worse it gets, which is why most corporations prefer to hire only those candidates who have been programmed longer, evidenced by university degrees, than those who were wise enough to have escaped the ritualistic cult abuse to learn about the real world.

Think about handling the situation in this scene–– first, if you were the boys’ age and then at your present stage in life and learning.

Remember to ask, “Who are YOU?”

go to: http://www.1channel.ch/watch-1096-Mystic-River

or:    http://www.cinecast.us/watch-mystic-river-22701-part1.html

.

The purpose of my book was to expose the fraudulent banking system and their collection agents, the courts.  I implemented various tactics to prove it.

All the things I did, albeit correct, are no longer allowed by the banks, which further proves their fraud. Everything we have done over the past 15 years is no longer winnable.  We cannot win against tyrants. Only a more powerful group can put them out of commission; we certainly have been unable to do so.

My book only scratched the surface on certain topics which now seem to be: worse than I thought, or completely irrelevant, or truer than I thought, or immaterial. This is to encourage us all to be even more vigilant and suspicious of everything other than our intuition. I still think we will prevail, but not in any way we could imagine and certainly not any way which is currently being promoted by anyone other than those who say, simply, “Know thyself”.

Immaterial:                                                                                                                                                Since I wrote my book, eight years ago, I have continued to wonder about what I wrote. I have always thought that anything channeled is suspect, so when I heard that ACIM is possibly a result of MK Ultra, I was not surprised. ACIM is likely the result of just one of the many ways that our computer brain is programmed by those who control the world and us. They download by couching what they want us to think, feel, and believe, within something about which we instinctively desire––sex, food, God, friendship, and even spiritual freedom. Certainly, there is valuable information in ACIM, yet, might it be only the conduit for their programs. ACIM texts are not simple to read. Accordingly, they appeal to intellectuals–those  who consider themselves too smart to be manipulated.

Maybe our entire lives are only the playing out of the most traumatic programs of our childhood. Maybe we just operate on the EMF around us and we do and think only to the extent of the particular EMF. Maybe ACIM is our clue to who we are––that we do NOT have free will, as we are only watching the movie of our lives on the DVD which cannot be changed.

Truer than I thought:
After reading a bit of the Bible, I suspect that what I wrote about God and LORD God is actually truer than I thought.  Not only are we on a prison planet but also we are locked within a prison body.  Those of us who have astral-traveled, had OBEs (out-of-body experiences) and lucid dreams, all know that we do not require the body to experience physical sensations. People have astral sex, go to the beach, visit Europe, etc., all without leaving the confines of their beds, and this is not dreaming. It is as real as if they were occupying their physical bodies.  So, why do we require a body?  I doubt we do. I suspect that, Genesis, Ch. 1, 26-28, when God said, “Let us make man in our image”, what we meant by that was this:  “Let us, as one spiritual, conscious frequency just fragment our one self for the purpose of gaining as many experiences as possible through a different frequency/density. When we have played out every possibility on the physical plane, we’ll disappear it all and become as one, again.”  So, what happened in chapter two?  LORD God, whoever that is, captured our individual souls, picked up some clay, and created bodies, which severely limited our spiritual capabilities and from which we could not escape until their death. These bodies, now owned and operated by LORD God, were designed as unique so we could be recognized as separate from one another, and were easy to program for his purposes, via the manipulation of the 12 strands of our DNA which were our receptors and connections to one another and source. We have been severely tampered with.

Completely irrelevant:
Any alleged solution which is outside ourselves. The list is endless: UCC, PPSA, “express, private-contract trusts”, IBOEs, PNs,  AFVs, commercial liens, Quantum Language, IRS forms 56, OID, etc. all of which were designed either to prove the fraud of the banks/courts, or to access the Direct Treasury Accounts and all of which, albeit possibly somewhat initially accurate and temporarily workable, have now proved worthless. Wasting our time and cash studying any patriot guru is for entertainment purposes only––not solutions. If you have heard their names and they are charging for their information, they do NOT have a solution. (To the extent of my knowledge, neither Dean Clifford nor Frank O’Collins charges for information.) The gurus all likely have a gun to their heads and have been told, “We will allow you to continue with your costly seminars, but you will be teaching what we tell you to teach.”

Recently, I re-discovered David Wynn Miller (DWM) and watched his May 2010 youtube video.  His stories alarmed me. When he said that he had met the great, great grandson of Joan of Arc––“what are the odds of that?”, I paused the video to answer, “Zero.” Joan of Arc had no children. She died at 19, was a devout Roman Catholic, had visions of God, and fought a war; I doubt she had the desire to reproduce, never mind the time. Even if she had, this man would have “great’, 14 times before “grandson”, not twice.

When he said that by writing the Wal-Mart contract for the Chinese, thereby increasing Wal-Marts from 100 stores to 1800, I was irked. When he said that he assisted a woman with her claim against the feds for her loss, due to the WTC demolition, and by doing so, vitiated thousands of other claims, I was appalled. When a man whom he assisted at court won his case and was told by the judge that he was free to go, DWM immediately left. The judge then asked the man if he understood what DWM had done. The man admitted he did not and was immediately sentenced to 18 months. DWM’s moral to this story was that we had better know this QL or we could wind up in jail. But, the truth of that story is that DWM ought to have taught the man that any questions from a resentful judge, subsequent to “you are free to go”, are just more offers to contract which he can decline.

DWM has accomplished much, as his QL is likely accurate, but what perturbs me is that, still, after years, there are no reports that any one else has ever won. DWM is unique in that he addresses the fraudulent language of the courts, rather than the commercial and ecclesiastical fraud of the courts, but, still, we cannot win against criminals. It is tantamount to telling the Gestapo, “You can’t do this to me!”

Worse than I thought:
All courts are structured on a concept similar to that of Las Vegas casinos. I’ve heard that both  the courts and the casinos winning odds are 86% to 14%. The wins, permitted by the house, are calculated to prompt the masses to think they, too, can win. From our perspective, we win only episodically and without rhyme or reason. The latest and greatest “process” from the Remedy Rock Stars is never any better or worse than what we have already tried. Each is likely somewhat theoretically accurate, but that is moot when, in practice, there is no win. The house/court always wins, even when we also do. It is solely a numbers game and the results of each case are arbitrary except for our competence and conduct. Again, the only reason for the very few wins at the casino/court is to convince the masses to “come on down” and TRY to win. This grants the casino/court the opportunity to fleece us out of our cash.

There is NO reason to accept an invitation to court. What causes us to think we must? The invitation is for them to entrap us via their trickery, deceit, threat, and coercion.  These courts have nothing to do with us; they are public servants’ conventions. Every officer of the court––judge, prosecutor, clerk, attorney, bailiff, sheriff, cop, works for the same employer. The situation is at least 5 against one. Our attending court suggests that we do not know this and that alone tells them that we are incompetent. How stupid do we have to be to jeopardize our physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual safety?  Just as “there is NO money” and “there is NO justice” and “there are NO facts”, so there is NO win against the banks/courts/casinos. So, don’t bother to listen to someone describe “how” he won a court case unless it includes his comprehension, conduct, competence, and his absence, none of which we can obtain from another. “Processes”, by which some have claimed to have won, are outside ourselves.

My suggestions:
What’s the best way to put anything out of commission?  Quit giving it our attention. We MUST quit going to court. Courts are NOT for executors and beneficiaries (us); courts are for public servants and trustees (not us). But, I’d be sure to tell them, before the date, why I won’t be going to court and I’d be sure to default them when they admit (by failing to deny or provide proof) that not only do I not belong there but also I have no contract with the Crown (or state). Since the Attorney General oversees the provincial/state attorneys, it would be prudent to apprise him also.

I do not believe “we are the ones we’ve been waiting for”.  I do not think that we can beat those who control the world, for just that reason––they control the world––ALL of it, but particularly the courts/banks. I do think something or someone can and will stop the insanity but that is not we. There must be some underground group, about which we couldn’t possibly know (we know about Anonymous), which is doing, on our behalf, work we can’t even imagine.  They must be highly brilliant, highly funded, and highly secretive. Likely, they hardly even know who they all are, themselves. How could we possibly know?  They might be off-planet entities, or renegades from top corporations/agencies, or powerful grass-rooters, or just a computer program with more AI than we have. Who knows?  We most certainly do not know because if we think we know who they are, then that is not they.

From a pragmatic perspective, all we can do is decline to contract with thugs, demand they prove a contract exists, state our role as occupant of the office of general executor, and continue to ask questions, even though they are never answered.  If we recall the most important aspects of their unlimited trickery:  to get us into contract; to cause us to forget who we are and who we are not, to confuse us about our role, to scoff at our knowledge, to intimidate, threaten, coerce, deceive, etc., we will be able to handle their confrontations.

I have nearly completed a letter to the Crown corporation, rejecting their lies, and ending with the warning that they will be destroyed––not by us but by their handlers. The very ones who write their pay-cheques will punish them for betraying their fellows. Hard to believe, isn’t it? But, remember that within the overall dishonour of the controllers, there exists honour, and anyone who violates that honour will be punished. The violators are not we, but the ones who deceived us––not the fat cats at the top but the whores at the bottom who, for a pay-cheque, deceived their fellow man. Remember #4 of the Nuremberg Principles.

From a spiritual perspective, our role is tantamount to:  “They also serve who only stand and wait.”  It is our inward action, not our outward action, which will stop the insanity. We must remain vigilant of what goes on within our minds. We are being controlled and attacked from angles of which we are not even aware, so we must continue to monitor our thoughts and that which grabs our attention. “The secret to life is mind management.”  We must think like George Sanders and Christopher Reeve of the original and remake, respectively, of the movie, “Village of the Damned”.  They held off the children’s attempt to control their minds, by envisioning a brick wall.  We must re-focus our time, energy, attention, and emotion, from their antics to our mind-management. I do not think we will have to endure the insanity of this world for much longer. Where we ought to be spending our time is doing what we love to do with those whose company we enjoy, simplifying our lives, and gazing inward.  We must ignore their demands for our attention. It is our minds which can allow us to feel joy, but also can ruin our joy. Remain extremely vigilant. Pay attention to intuition. Stay out of the casinos.

…

Good grief!  Am I tired of hearing that! –– from ALL the gurus. They are wont to reveal their ‘solution to everything’.  “Here’s what to say, what to write, what to do, how to behave –– we’ve done it; this WORKS!  This “process” will work for you, too, unless, of course, there is an injured party.”  There is NEVER an ‘injured party’!

To whom could they possibly be referring?!?!  The court system operates in commercial, equity, contract, trust, maritime, probate, admiralty …. law and there is NO other “law”, in a fraudulent “justice system”. It is ALL about money and there exist only codes, rules, regulations, statutes, ordinances, by-laws, acts, bills, legislations, constitutions, policies, customs, treaties, and charters to support this fraud. There is NO “law” other than the dog and pony show they put on in court for the entertainment of the public servants and for the deceit of the rest of us.

I continue to hear about “the common law”, meaning that we must not harm another or his property. But this is just one more of THEIR ‘laws’. So, if we do harm another, then the matter goes to court. What kind of court?  There is ultimately only one kind of court––the kind that is ALL about MONEY!  There is never anything to do with human rights, common law rights, civil rights, etc., unless it has something to do with money. The mere fact that money is the form of compensation which is offered to an alleged ‘injured party’ tells us that we cannot UNDO any harm done to anyone. Court is ALL about punishment which is all about ‘money’. Sure, sometimes a man will win, but this is only to maintain the facade that “justice has prevailed”. It is only to keep us coming back in hopes of a win (think Las Vegas).

Yes, ‘common law’ is how we can file a civil suit where a man can exact damages from another man, but, again, this, also, is to the court’s advantage.  A contract must exist, in order to prove a breach in all marriage, business, and professional contracts.  The state demands we obtain a licence for everything because the licence is what deems us to be public servants whom the state controls.  Most of us do not want to harm our fellows but, unless the court system can prove that we were involved in the function of government at the time of an incident, i.e.: acting as public servants (the only entities over whom the state has jurisdiction) then, the courts have no authority. Our possession of a licence makes their job of proving that we are, indeed, public servants easier, even though they must prove that we were behaving as such, at the time of the incident. It would be easier not to have a licence and, thus, not be a public servant, so that the matter of their jurisdiction is not even a possibility. As always, the only way anyone has authority over us is via our consent. Licensure suggests consent and we must remain very vigilant not to fall into the trap of believing that the courts have jurisdiction over us when we do not have them.

The instant that an alleged injured party is “injured”, he complains to someone who files the complaint into the court which creates a case matter between two corporate entities, i.e.:  legal fictions.  Neither the court nor the agents of the court, which includes both the alleged plaintiff and the alleged defendant, can be a living man or woman because living men and women cannot operate in court or in commerce or in the public. We require a title or role in their fiction, in order to do so. The title of that role IS a legal fiction. Court is for legal fictions, public trustees, and employees of the government, and no man has any right or any obligation to be in court, for any reason.  Court is merely the forum where legal fictions occasionally compensate the alleged victim with ‘money’ or punish the alleged victimizer via confiscation of his ‘money’, and for the monetary enrichment of the court employees; no other reason.

But all parties to any court action are legal fictions, not men and women. This is just another way we are tricked into believing in their illusion. No one can harm a legal fiction/corporation/illusion/name. I am reminded of when I asked a cop in NM, “Who’s the injured party?”  He answered, “The State of New Mexico.”  I laughed out loud and the look on his face indicated that he realized how idiotic he sounded.

We are also tricked into believing that God told us, in the Bible, to “do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”  Fiction!  In Luke 6:31, Jesus says something to that effect which refers back to Matthew 7:12 which refers back to Leviticus 19:18 which ends with “I am the LORD”.  Even Jesus admits, “….which is the law and the prophets”; what does that mean?  Is Jesus an agent of LORD God or Creator God?  The alleged “golden rule” was not God’s law, as everyone thinks, because God made NO laws. All the “laws” in the Bible were made by LORD God––yes, the egotistical, angry, vengeful, jealous, and insane God about whom the entire Bible is written, except for the first chapter of Genesis.

Another way to look at that absurd piece of propaganda is that perverts, masochists, and severely-indoctrinated Roman Catholics, with their notions of self-flagellation (not to mention all the other rituals to which these automatons adhere), would agree with that. They would love to be able to do unto others as they would, no doubt, just love to have another do unto them.  What insanity!  The point of that quotation––or, for that matter, any of the Ten Commandments given by LORD God–– is NOT to have us treat one another kindly; otherwise it would say so. That point is for the controllers–– in their allegiance to LORD God, not Creator God–– to have yet one more ‘law’ by which to control us.  Remember it was they who edited the Bible for their agenda which was and still is all about controlling us.

So, there can never be an “injured party”, in any court case, even when an injured party (man/woman) really does exist. Proof of this is when we truly have been injured by the public and so we file a suit against them. Do we prevail in court?  They also know that their injury to a man has nothing to do with the court matter––the legal fiction name bringing the suit–– and the reason, for the very rare occasion when we might prevail, is only to prove the exception which is meant to confuse us into believing that there is some justice in the fraudulent justice system. The courts do not work for us; they work for ‘money’.  They will never work for us until we find a way to force them to do their jobs as Public Servants.  I feel certain that Dean Clifford has found a way to do so and this is by our knowing “who we are and who we are not”.  Yes, what a tired-out cliché!  Yet, his take on this is brilliant and he offers an innovative solution.  Don’t miss him.

Go to:  http://www.freemanitoba.com/   and hear all episodes of his lectures (about 1/4 hour each). Also, hear his interview:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IaN3MpWnAFk     He is a brave and brilliant young man.  I’ll be posting summaries of his information.

PS:  For those of you who like to go to court to observe from the gallery, either to hear the deceit from a safe position or to support a friend in the hot seat, I have learned that even you in the gallery are “agents” of the matter because you are witnesses to the proceeding.  Accordingly, you are in a position to protest the manner in which a proceeding is being carried out. When you hear a lie from the judge or the prosecutor (which is inevitable) you have the right––not to mention the DUTY––to stand up and say that you cannot witness any more of this Breach of Trust as you do not want to be held liable as a party to a Breach of Trust, so you will now be leaving. “Don’t say another word until I am gone as I do not want to be held liable as an acquiescing witness to the Breach of Trust being demonstrated in this proceeding.”  Then, leave. Let me know what your friends report to you about what happens next.  (smile)

.