Spiritual Economics Now

Part 1

The ‘debt’ really does exist, but only because we operate in a ‘debt-money’ system. There is no substance; i.e.: money which we can use to pay our debts. Since we, the private, are now the only ones who can create anything of any value, the public (a dead, bankrupt fiction), must rely upon us to make everything happen and that includes creating more debt for everything to function. We all think of ‘debt’ as a bad thing, yet, it is only how this particular economic system operates. So, ‘being in debt’ is a neutral situation – neither ‘good’ nor ‘bad’. ‘Zero-balance’ means that everything is at zero. If the public draws from zero, within a liability/debt account, they have a negative; if they add to zero, they have a positive, yet, because it is all debt/liability, they can have negative debt and positive debt. ‘Debt’ is not bad; it just is.

Conversely, we, the private, create credit. Every time we sign anything, we create credit. “The signature is the money”. There is an asset account, backed by the birth certificate, the application for which was signed by a parent, thereby creating a trust account. It also must have a zero balance. When we draw from it, there is negative asset and when we add to it, there is positive asset. The public operates in debt/liability and we operate in credit/asset,  AND NE’ER THE TWAIN SHALL MEET (except via a token, aka a ‘Name’); One account cannot connect with the other. The public operates from debt and we operate from asset. The minute our asset touches the public, it becomes debt and the instant public debt touches the private, it becomes asset.  Let’s use the power bill as the example:

The power company has access to the trust account, from which it draws, in order to have the capital to provide us power. At the end of the month, those at the power company send us a ‘statement of account’. What the top part is telling us, without actually stating, is, “We went to your asset trust account and withdrew $100 in order to provide you power; is that alright with you, Creditor? If so, please just evidence your acceptance of this by writing on this statement, ‘Accepted, the account number, the number of the bond backing the account, which only you would have, and your signature.’  As we have sent the cheque for you to endorse, which will bring your trust account balance back up to zero, please sign and endorse it and return it to us with the statement so that we can balance our books.” The story is the same for credit-card statements.

What they actually write is, “Be sure to return the voucher with your payment”, thereby misleading us to think that we are required to give them $100 worth of our labour, along with their cheque which offsets the liability, and nothing else. They are simply soliciting our agreement which our signature indicates. So, the voucher/cheque will balance not only their books but also the asset trust account. But somehow, we got roped into forking over our debt-notes (which they want as much as we do because we all use dollars to obtain what we need and want, yet have nothing to do with the account with the power company). These debt-notes have nothing to do with “paying our bills”; there is nothing to ‘pay’, nothing with which to ‘pay’, and the account cannot be ‘paid’ – it can only be offset with the cheque/voucher they sent us for our signature.

Now, our cash is in the public and ought not to be because the public doesn’t operate in cash; it operates via double-entry bookkeeping, ‘t-charts’ of asset and liability, because there is no ‘money’.  Since all these debt-notes are out there as “the debt”, in the “public”, this means that we are the cause of the “public debt” which must be offset.  But, what we are told is that the public debt must be “paid” and, of course, this is an impossibility because if we ‘pay’ ‘public debt’ with ‘debt’, all that occurs is that we double the debt. The only way out of this mess is for us to do whatever it takes to remove the debt-notes, aka ‘cash’, aka ‘the debt’ from the public. For a long time, we thought that we had to offset the public debt, but the public debt has not been caused by anything other than our having put cash where it not only doesn’t belong and cannot be used in any productive manner but also is creating havoc with the economy. Now that we know that we must get the debt out of the public, so that there is no more ‘public debt’, how do we recall the trillions of dollars of debt?

We call in the biggest, best, most-efficient debt collectors in the world: the IRS. If they can’t do it, no one can.  So, by filing the correct forms with the IRS, we let them know how much of our cash/labour/debt-notes we have errantly put out there into the public. We are so sorry we made this ridiculous mistake, but, we took the word (“Be sure to return this voucher with your payment” – hmmm. I guess I have to send a cheque along with the voucher – BEEEP!  Wrong-o!) of people at corporations, forgetting that corporations are “for-profit”, faceless, heartless, entities with no intent other than ‘economic growth’ and to control the planet through the use of our energy.  Sure, we might encounter a friendly voice at the other end of the phone, but she has been as programmed as the rest of us in our thinking that we are obligated to “pay our bills”. Very few of us know that with every dollar we put into the public and neglect to claim it back, we are creating more and more problems for our fellow man, never mind for ourselves and our families.

IRS to the rescue!  Filing the proper forms at the proper time will allow the IRS to go back to the banks which are withholding the tax – the credit we created by writing cheques, wiring funds, using debit and credit cards, etc. and request that the funds be returned to the creditor. The IRS will gladly deposit, into our bank accounts, that which the bank has been withholding, in escrow, because when funds are in escrow, no one can use them. They are just sitting there. THAT is “the public debt”.  If we don’t get the debt moving and functioning, we will be taken down by it. Our cash/labour/debt-notes will sit in escrow, doing nothing, for 36-47 months (depending upon when we put our cash into the public) when both we and the banks could be using it to continue to circulate and keep the economy moving. After this time, if we have failed to claim our abandoned cash, the banks will. THIS might be why banks got a bad name, yet, what’s true is, we created our own problem by not knowing that we are responsible for recovering the funds and keeping us all out of debt. Our claiming a refund of our public funds will work for all involved.

The worst thing that is happening, right now, is that the public debt – our cash which we could all be using – is sitting and stagnating, in escrow. Only we can do something about this. The two causes of this huge problem are:  (1.  people are not requesting their funds be returned to them; and,  (2.  due to fear, people are slowing their spending. The staggering truth of all this is: the more we spend, the more we get returned to us. The faster the spend, the sooner we will get the funds returned to us.  We must do a complete 180º flip on our regard and assessment of “the public debt”.

I write this only because realize that I cannot suggest to most people that we must remove ourselves from the Commerce Game. I am reminded of an old Beetle Bailey comic. Several soldiers are sitting around a table, playing poker; cigarettes are falling out of ashtrays or hanging from their lips, beer bottles are covering the table, soldiers have nearly fallen asleep on the table but are still holding their cards in their hands, with one eye open, etc. They appear completely exhausted, drunk, and dazed. Two higher ranking soldiers appear and one looks at the other, amazed by the idiocy of what he sees. The other officer says, “Well, no one wanted to quit when he was losing, no one wanted to quit while he was ahead, and no one would let the winner quit…”  “How long have they been at it?”  “Four days.”  I think many of us are in this poker game. Will it ever end?

I suspect that we will have to do this for awhile before we feel avenged. I guess we have to experience “win” before we realize that there is no “win” when we are playing a game … the winning of which is based upon clobbering our fellow man.

Part 2:  What’s Next?

Turning 60 afforded me some insight: Winning a game that exists only as a result of the projection of our fear for survival is still not a place where we want to hang out for any length of time. We can all see what is going on in the world. Anyone reading this will agree that, thanks to quantum physics and mechanics, an endless list of people have proven that what we see in ‘the world’ is purely, simply, and solely a reflexion of what is being projected by the thoughts in our minds, propelled by the emotion in our hearts, at any given time. Life on this planet is nothing like what we have all been raised to believe it is – not even close.

From the minute we arrive in this fictional world, we realize that there is an authority in our lives. We know that if mums do not feed us, we do not eat. Not much later, we grasp that everyone is trying to run our lives. Parents act authoritatively because their parents did so with them and they are only, unconsciously, projecting onto their children the way they were treated. This is simply the memory of the cell and, I hear, a specific part of the cell which holds memory, not the DNA which, until recently, we all thought.

Next, we go to school where we drown in authority. School is deliberately designed for our left brains. Socializing, games, art, and music are all right-brained and, although we are not discouraged from pursuing these, they simply are ‘not as important as’ the core subjects which we had to know, in order to graduate, in order to get a good job, in order to compete with and beat-out our fellows, in order to succeed in life. Are we there, yet?  Academia never made anyone happy. I never had a conversation, with any friend, about academia, unless said friend were a teacher and his/her position was the “defence of” education or authority … bleah!   This is how children, full of creativity, spend the bulk of their childhoods – around people telling them that school is too serious a place to socialize which, we all discover, albeit too late, was the only reason we were there in the first place. What is life all about, anyway?

By the time we reach the age of seven, our core beliefs are: I’m not good enough; I’m not worthy; I’m insignificant; I’m not lovable; I don’t exist; I don’t have a life; I don’t have a future;  life is frightening, life is dangerous; I’m not allowed to make a mistake; if I make a mistake, I will be punished, ergo, I shall not venture forth because I might make a mistake; life is easier when the ‘authorities’ tell me how to live.  These beliefs came from decisions we made, as children, when we were threatened, – when we feared for our very survival. These beliefs are ‘compounded annually’, at school, and are precisely what allows the alleged “authorities” to run our lives … completely. These beliefs force us to defer to these authorities, whether they be parents, relatives, teachers, doctors, ministers, bankers, lawyers,  judges, cops, peers … “grown-ups”, or whether they be the matching concepts of these, such as family, school, medicine, religion, commerce, law, what’s vogue, the latest fashion, etc.  … anyone whom or anything that we have deemed to be ‘better than’, ‘wiser than’, ‘more successful than’, ‘happier than’, ‘making more money than’, ‘in possession of more stuff than’, ‘trusted by more people than’, ‘receiving more attention than’ … we are.

When we focus on what is outside of us, we completely miss the most valuable aspect of life: our intuition. When we fail to listen to our intuition, which is the only source from which we can know what is best for our unique selves, we become one of the crowd which is so, so, so easily controlled by those whose intent it is to control us. What is the means by which we are controlled?  To be kept in the vibration of fear – the same level of frequency at which we were when we made all those decisions about how we cannot live our own lives.

When I receive emails which are fear-filled, I know that the people who sent them are in fear and they are desperately seeking agreement because misery loves company and they want to be told how to live, in order to stop feeling the fear. For those of you who do this, please realize that you are the instigators of the fear and that you have been manipulated into feeling the fear by those who want you in fear because fear is the only emotion by which you can be controlled. Brave, courageous people who know who they are cannot be controlled. They might feel fear, yet, they do not take action from fear. They behave contrary to the disempowering emotion of fear.

If you are one who spreads fear, you make your own life worse, as it is emotion which creates life, so, being in fear, you create fearful circumstances. Egos love to waste your time looking for evidence and agreement. Egos love ‘to be right’. You are being entrapped by your own mind. There is nothing ‘wrong’ with feeling fear, as long as you don’t DO anything about it. There is nothing going on ‘out there’ of which you need to apprise us; there is only what is going on with your thoughts and emotions which need to be assessed. If you intend to bring others into a fear-filled existence, can you see that you are part of the problem? If you want your circumstances to change, you must opt to be part of the solution: change the thoughts you entertain.

Fear for our survival is ‘base (first) chakra’ energy.  All the other 6 (at least) chakras are above it. Imagine life for those who never get to live beyond first chakra energy. They spend their entire lives in fear for survival and, as is the wont of the ego, they go about gathering proof that they are ‘right’ so they look for situations and people who also see life as fearful. This does not make them accurate; it only makes them ‘right’ which is the sole ‘reason for being’ of the ego mind. It lives to prove itself ‘right’. Egos prefer to be ‘right’ than ‘happy’. Don’t fall for this nonsense.

I learned from my RET (Rapid Eye Technology) teacher that when we are, figuratively, ‘kicked in the heart’ which seems to happen to all of us in our early years, we all move away from our heart (4th) chakra which means that, in shifting our consciousness away from ‘heart’, the heart energy itself becomes diminished. No wonder heart disease is rampant!  Interesting, men and women interpret this trauma differently and they shift both their energy and focus (their consciousness) 2 chakras away from the heart, yet, in different directions. Men shift down 2 chakras and women shift up 2 chakras. Men’s energy moves down into their second (sex) chakra  and women’s energy moves up into their sixth (intellectual) chakra. Is there anyone more annoying than men whose “feelings” are about sex and women whose “feelings” are intellectual?  Since that includes most of us, just think of yourself and everyone close to you.  We’ve all heard the complaints, “Men, quit thinking with your penis!” “Women, get out of your head!”  In my book, I described the treachery and horrors of the feminists who thought that corporations would be better off with women at the top. This might have been true, had these women remained women, but, they didn’t. They put on suits and became men. Just what we need – more testosterone in the workplace. Believe me, masculine women are vastly more dangerous than feminine men. (Think ‘female cops’, as opposed to ‘male interior designers’.)

The same people who operate the schools operate medicine, law, religion, politics, etc. We have literally been programmed to death. I mean it: we have been programmed completely OUT of knowing who we are when, in fact, only we can educate ourselves, heal our bodies, intuit what is best for us, evolve spiritually, and operate at such a high frequency that NONE of what society has to offer ought to have any appeal, whatsoever, to the spiritual beings that we truly are. How low class all society is!  How plebeian!  What dregs we have become!  Yes, even those of us who have achieved what appears to be success.  We were destined to much loftier positions than that where we allow others to presume authority over us. Who allows this and why?  You know, now. It is we and it is our inability to “feel” and intuit. Do you see that all the institutions and establishments of society are designed this way?  So that we are unable to feel and intuit?  But, who or what created our society?

Getting back to quantum physics and mechanics, we all now know that what is in our lives began with us. In our fear, we projected onto our world our thoughts about ourselves, via our emotion which was and is, for the most part fear. We now know that what appears to be “out there” in the world, is the effect, manifestation, and reflexion of what is going on within us. This is why trying to heal anything, in what appears to be “our world”, is absolutely futile if we do not correct the cause.

When I worked as a nurse, I was always disappointed to hear that a patient was intending to undergo any sort of surgery, but surgery “to get the cancer” made me the craziest.  I had learned, from experience, that if I advised a patient not to allow a surgeon, who is totally uneducated on how the mind works, to chop off her breast, the only result was that I got fired; the patient still lost her breast. So, I realized that this is what the patient wanted, even though I knew she had been manipulated into wanting it. Inevitably, the patient was pleased by her loss of a breast (!!!) and would proudly tell me, “He got it all”, meaning, the doctor got all the cancer out of her body. I was never able to resist asking, “Did he get your mind, as well?”  Since the cancer began with her thoughts, interpretations,  judgements, and decisions, about a traumatic event in her life, and brought into the physical realm via her fear, anger, or grief, the only way to get rid of it was to reverse-engineer the process. Begin with the emotion, get back to the thinking, then to the event, and release everything along the way. Chopping off breasts is neither a solution nor even real.

“Reality” is not real; the only thing ‘real’ is “we are”.  Any seeming physical solution is, literally, truly, and only, as David Icke says, “combing the mirror” when one has a bad-hair day. It will have NO impact, whatsoever. When people fail to correct the cause of cancer, it always returns. Ask any cancer patient. If she has not taken a look into her life, she will go right back to where she started.  There is no healing outside the mind; there is nothing outside the mind. When I say “mind”, I mean that which gets projected – a combination of: an experience, our interpretation of it which results in our thoughts, our judgement about those thoughts which results in a decision, and any combination of fear, anger, grief over that decision which creates our experiences in what we call “life” and the cycle begins again, with the experience we have just now created. What absurdity!  This is why I can say that life is truly insane and what is prompting us to believe that we can do anything about life, outside ourselves, is total insanity. This includes: ‘helping another’, as we can only be an example, hence, we are almost always in an upward or downward spiral of life events because how we see the previous is how we will experience the next event.  We are always in this process. I am fortunate only in that I am aware of it.

We cannot do anything; we can only be; there is nothing out there; there is only here; we cannot pre-empt for the future and we cannot correct the past; we have only now. Is this how the mystics, sages, and masters of life arrived at:  BE HERE NOW ?

Now, we ought to take a look at all this in relation to how we are trying to correct the corruption on the planet. Every aspect of what is ‘wrong’ in this world is caused only and completely by commerce. All of it. But, let’s start by recalling that everything we think we see “in the world” is only a reflexion of our best thinking and it all began with us. Everything we experience is due to our core beliefs which are caused by decisions having been made from fear for our survival and the world we see is the effect, caused by our projected fear. I’m not saying that there isn’t love everywhere, all the time, in all of us, for everything; I’m saying that what we see in the world is simply the effect of most of the thinking, done by most of us, most of the time, which is the cause of all our angst.

Since love is all there is, it is all encompassing and can have no opposite. Since fear – love’s seeming opposite –  cannot exist, it is unreal. If fear is unreal, then anything ostensibly created by its projection is equally unreal. Since the world we experience is the physical manifestation of our projected fear, then the world is unreal.

“Nothing real can be threatened; nothing unreal exists.” – A Course In Miracles

This puts us into a vastly more powerful position, to change it all – all that which is not real. How simple! How powerful!  If what is going on in the world truly were real, we would have a hell of a time trying to change all that!  This is not to discount those who really are making a difference, but the real difference begins with their feelings, now with their actions. Every day and in every way, people all over the world are intending to accomplish this irrational, impossible, insane feat of changing the world without addressing the cause which is the game we are playing, based upon the projection of our fear for our survival, based upon the belief that we are separate from one another – the Commerce Game. The solution to the world problems caused by the Commerce Game, is right here, right now, with me. My choosing love instead of fear is the solution.

In my book, I set out to prove my premise that the banking system is fraudulent. I prevailed. I did experiments which proved it. These same methods could not be used now, in order to prove this, because what I did was years ago and those who didn’t like what I did are now on the look-out for those who intend to do the same things. So, cops, courts, judges, et al now know how to thwart us, in a myriad of ways. What I’ve noticed, over the past 13 years, is that everything any of us have done, works – a bit. Every process we have ever tried has succeeded, at least for some of us, for some of the time, in some places. Then, it doesn’t. Judges go to “judge school” every 6 months and learn how to handle those of us who have temporarily prevailed. Then the process comes to a screeching halt.

I finally woke up and reconciled what I know to be true with what I know to be true. We are doing this to ourselves. We are actually brilliant enough to have set up a situation, for the sole purpose of learning that the only thing in existence is love … the only thing in existence … is love. Everything else which appears to be in existence is unreal, doesn’t exist, is reflexion, effect, and cause of thinking which is combined with strongly felt emotion.

The tragedy is that our emotions have been manipulated by society. We have been entranced and prevented from feeling the only emotion from which we can co-create.  Feeling love is how to become love and is how to have it be the way we all want it to be. We can manifest only from love. Love is such a high frequency that it puts us back into the driver’s seat. As long as we are in fear, we are being manipulated. The only way to remain in control is to be willing to be out of control. The very willingness to be out-of-control is love. Love is a ‘willing’ emotion and nothing is more powerful than love. I adore the actual statistics on this. The electricity of the heart is 100 times that of the brain and the magnetic power of the heart is 500 times that of the brain; unless it is vice versa, but, either way, if we want to be powerful, we must operate from the very place which we long ago shut down and created a society which kept women intellectual and analytical and which kept men sexual. What a waste of our true talent and energy!

We have all been fleeced, yet, again, who did this to whom? Our world is a manifestation of our thoughts and feelings. Knowing this allows us to do something about it. We are not helpless against our own creation. If this were the creation of the evil entities of this universe, we’d be  sunk, but this simply isn’t so. Yes, our thoughts and feelings are being manipulated, via the Authority Hoax and all other aspects of our societies, but ULTIMATELY, WE ARE IN CHARGE OF THE THOUGHTS WE ENTERTAIN AND THE FEELINGS WE EXPERIENCE.  OUR ACTIONS FROM THOSE THOUGHTS AND FEELINGS ARE WHAT DICTATE OUR LIFE ON THIS PLANET.

We are so in charge that we designed a game in order to wake us up to our true nature and our true intent – to shift into the love frequency. The commerce game can be won only by realizing that we created it for our benefit. Every seeming adversity to our lives is to trick ourselves to see if we can remember. We came here knowing that love is all there is, yet, in order to play the game, we had to forget. We even went so far as to identify with the token (the body, the name) we use to play the game. We truly cannot ‘beat an opponent’ in a game which was designed for the purpose of allowing us to realize that the only way to win is to remember who we are and to remember that nothing exists without love. Its almost existential, isn’t it?  Like ping pong balls in your head.

We cannot see the picture whilst seeing it from inside the frame. Once we truly walk away from the game, very miraculous things will be revealed to us. We know there is more. No one, in the past several hundred years, or in a society such as ours, or subject to a belief that we would be both winning and losing against ourselves, has experienced what we are about to experience. When we take a chance on our faith that our higher self – intuition – connection to source – subconscious mind – spirit self – co-creator – oversoul will take care of us, not only will it do so but also it will give us everything and more than we could ever imagine. If we stop to wonder “how”, we have just, energetically, denied the entire process.

What are we doing?!  We choose to trust a treacherous system of society – commerce –  that has been proven to be not only completely unworkable but also downright vicious for 95% of us, while, in the case of our higher-self – our oversoul, which is connected to omniscient, omnipotent Source, and whose only job and full intent is to mind our complete well-being, via its wisdom, insight, and timelessness …  we choose not to trust that?!  In fact, we completely ignore it ?!?!?

So many people lecture on spirituality, yet, they continue to charge their fellow man for lectures, books, etc. They at the very pinnacle of our third dimension, so they appear to be very enlightened, yet, their failure even to glimpse the 4th dimension is evidenced by their belief that they have to charge their fellow man. I don’t think the problem is that they want more ‘money’; I think the real problem is that “not charging” (being free) has never even occurred to them. What does this tell us about their level of spiritual development?

There is an entire universe out there which we can access, utilize, and appreciate, if only we operate in the frequency where all is possible. Miracles appear for those without fear. So many of us have experienced miracles, just by letting go of the game: we quit charging our fellow man, quit worrying, and now trust that our oversoul will take care of us.

We’re all one; we are all the same at our spiritual core; we are all co-creators with love because we ARE love. We can do this.

***

I want you all to know 4 things:

1. I am in the process of writing another article. I’ll be tackling the subject of “commerce” from another perspective.

For those who want to remain in the Commerce Game, I recommend Brandon: www.creditorsincommerce.com

For those who are interested in getting out of the Commerce Game, stay tuned. I’ll post an article, soon.

2. There are several websites where people are selling my book. My book has always been, is, and will always be free online at: www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net/solutions/How_I_08.pdf

3. I  delete all the comments on my blog because I have discovered that 90% of them are spam, 7% are nonsense, 2% are vicious, and only 1% are from people who are still thinking and feeling. It is not worth my time to read them all for so few insightful comments.  My apologies to the 1%.

4. I found, on youtube, the Twilight Zone episode I saw in 1960, that I mentioned in my book. Here is part 3/3, with the pertinent message:     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5u-QVk3PFU&NR=1

***

I wonder if IRS/CRA employees ought to know this. You might want to pass it along to them; it IS the loving thing to do.  

*

It just crossed my mind that you might be unfamiliar with the banking system. Allow me to use the “Lottery” as an example. People generally use cash to buy lottery tickets. The lottery pot is about $20M at any given time – CASH!  If you won $8,000 in the lottery, you would take the ticket for verification. Would someone go to the cash drawer and count out your $8,000?  No; he would write you a cheque. If you accepted the cheque and never did anything with it, nothing would occur. Nothing would change. No accounts would be debited; no accounts would be credited. That cheque is valueless until you endorse it. When you do, suddenly, it is worth $8,000. What’s different?  Your signature is what gave it value.  This can be verified in §57.1 of the Bills of Exchange Act of Canada (your law) which states that the signature is the money. 

Now, if you were to deposit that cheque, your account would be credited. If you were to cash the cheque, the bank would give you $8,000 cash. Then, what happens to the cheque?  Its value to the bank is quite incredible because that credit can off-set the liability of your cash receipt or account credit and, now, their ledger is balanced at no cost to the bank. 

Banks are permitted, by law (the Bank Act), to hypothecate the value and lend it out numerous times for dramatic profit. (For details on how banks make a fortune from your signature, Google: Money As Debt). Suffice it to say that the cheque became a huge asset – vastly more than its face value. So far, you have benefitted a bit and the bank has benefited a lot, by your signature, but the real winner, by far, is the Lottery itself because the bank returned the cheque to them. Although it is worth only $8,000 on its face, the signature upon it grants it interminable value. That cheque gets sold on the securities market and it literally travels the world creating a profit each time it is sold. So, your signature has created another fortune, this time for the Lottery. Did they EVER have to dig into their pot of $20M in order to give you your win of $8,000?  No.  You thought $8,000 was a windfall, but the truth is, bankers profited by far more than you did and it was all funded by you.  YOU created your lottery win.

Can you see that the Lottery is simply a cash-confiscatory game for the ones who run it – the World Bank?  Can you see that IRS/CRA operates the same way?  Can you see that IRS/CRA is just an agency of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank?  If you grasp this concept, you’ll see that not only do I not “owe” IRS/CRA anything but also I was the source of value which will create egregious revenue for IRS/CRA which has nothing at all to do with the government of U.S.A. or Canada, or the states or the provinces, or the people of either. Its sole purpose is CASH-CONFISCATION. I am certain that you, also, have felt the effects of the IMF on your personal finances. Whatever your loss, it is important for you to know that it was all by design and intention. 

Please realize the truth of this, before you consider confiscating, from me, the meagre amount that I have, compared to what IRS/CRA will receive, forever, from my signature. I created ALL the value and IRS/CRA is the beneficiary of that. 

Then, please, consider a job more suited to your ethics. You’ll feel much happier and your family will be very proud of you.  

*

Authority Hoax II – “the Trust Account” and “the Solution”

Imagine how people will interact with each other when they know they cannot harm another person, place, condition or thing without harming themselves. Imagine the difference when people, everywhere, accept the divine truth: as they give, so shall they receive. – Don Alejandro Cirilo Perez Oxlaj 

The Trust Account

In my article, The Authority Hoax, I wrote: ‘The only thing you need to know about laws – codes, rules, regulations, statutes, by-laws, ordinances, constitutions, policies, legislations, laws, bills,  acts, and even case law – is that they have nothing to do with you. The USA and CANADA, Inc., along with all other corporations (STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, etc.) have a Policy Manual, just as SEARS has a Policy Manual for employees. Unless we work for SEARS, their Policy Manual does not apply to us.’ The head servant of the mansion’s kitchen staff put up a Notice which reads, ‘No Refrigerator Raiding: 11 pm to 7 am’. Does the mistress of the house think that this applies to her? The only ‘laws’ by which we are bound are Nature’s laws and our conscience. 

     For years, I was on the fence between wanting to know who I am and behaving accordingly so that I didn’t have to play the commerce game, and wanting to know how to play the game so that I could win the game. It always seemed as if we were getting closer to the answer, but the investigation was interminable. Most researchers continue to look outside, rather than looking to themselves, recalling their experiences, and remembering who they are. It seems that, for all the riding ‘madly off in all directions’, all their various, personal agenda come down to only this: we are all tired of being controlled. 

     I notice that those who search legal land for the answer, albeit to no avail, still do learn much in the process and wind up wanting to sell their information because, “I put a lot of time and effort into this and I’m not about to give it away.” But, isn’t the reason that they did all this research because they wanted to do so? Now they want people to pay them for what they chose to do? The only information worth having is that which will allow us access to the Trust account. The very act of their charging their fellow man evidences that they do not know this, not to mention the dishonor, i.e.; they do to others what the banks are doing to all of us. 

Due to all this ‘learning’, so many researchers have a penchant for wanting to utilize their information and this is what gets them into trouble. They write too much and they say too much – all because they want to be ‘right’ in thinking that years of study were not spent in vain, so they tend to take on the task of settling public matters, by acting as the liable party, instead of making the public servant do his job. The one who creates the liability, i.e. the public, must provide the remedy. Balancing their books is not our job. They work for us. 

     People who do not have this valuable information, paradoxically, are very willing to sell and tell what they purport to know. But, if we cannot figure this out by ourselves, it is no good to us. No one can tell us how to know who we are. To become free and to feel free is not a process… it is a realization. 

     I have received hundreds of emails from people who criticize me for not telling them how to implement what I wrote in my book. If I had included a ‘how to’ in my book, it would have been outdated by the time it hit the internet. I am stunned by the number of people who missed seeing, in my preface, ‘I do not, cannot, and will not tell anyone what to do’.  The title of my book is ‘How I Clobbered…’  not, ‘How YOU Can Clobber…’ I wrote the book to expose the fraudulent banking system and I did certain things to prove it. My book was simply and only a heads-up so people could think about conducting their commercial affairs accordingly and begin to experiment for themselves. I put the book on the internet free-of-charge. It offers only hints for you to realize who you are, which is all any of us need to know. 

     Of these hundreds of requests for ‘what to do’, not one ever asked me about the latter part of my book – ‘remembering who you are’; the part about energy – which is all there is. In whatever we do or say, what matters is our energy and the attitude from where we behave, so my ‘telling’ someone what to say or do is worthless. Becoming free requires ‘remembering who you are’, so when you come across websites or seminars, just remember; those who sell and tell don’t know, and those who DO know cannot tell. ‘Knowing’ is a private matter and one cannot make it pubic. The minute it becomes public, the win can no longer stand as a win. I had to look to myself. Accurate answers come effortlessly, from within.   

     In one of my snits of frustration, recently, I packed it all in (as I do episodically) and read Gregg Braden’s book, The Spontaneous Healing of Belief – Shattering the Paradigm of False Limits. He reminded me of what I have known for decades – that we can create… in fact, that’s all we can do. We don’t do anything but create. We create every aspect of our life experience. If we really knew who we are, we would not be dabbling in any of this commercial investigation, particularly, because every bit of energy we hand over to those who seem to be running the planet only strengthens them. What we want to do is turn away from them and look to ourselves. Why fight someone else’s creation when we have our own creating to do? We’ve already created them as they are; now, we must create something that will override that. As long as we are giving them our time, attention, energy, and emotion (which is what keeps them alive), those whom we most want to convince that we know who we are know that we do NOT know who we are by the very fact that we are involved with them and their silly ‘policy manuals’. Dealing with agents, at their level, proves that we believe that the illusion of their authority is real and, ergo, the reality of ours is not. We ought to have nothing to do with them, other than to be sure they keep their word, honor their oaths, and do their jobs. Servants must always be monitored, lest they overstep their position.

     If we knew who we are, we would have nothing to do with them. This includes their ‘medicine’, their ’schools’, their ‘law’, their ‘churches’, their ‘media’, etc. – ALL designed to keep us from knowing who we truly are. Somehow, they know this; hence, every time we converse with them, frequent their places of ‘worship’, argue over ‘payment’, read their ‘newspapers’, go to their ‘courts’, follow or resist their “orders”, attend their ‘classes’, visit their ‘doctors’, etc., they know that we do not know who we are and they treat us accordingly. If we knew who we were, we would be minding our own health, educating ourselves, conducting our own spiritual development, and not deferring to them for anything.  

     I simply cannot even imagine the enlightened beings of this planet poring over law books, writing paper, learning what to say in court, filing documents, attending seminars, paying for the latest process, etc. in order to get out of a situation which they know, in their hearts, simply does not involve them. They know who they are. I have concluded that, as long as we are still investigating any aspect of the commerce game, those who control it have us where they want us – IN the game, which they control, by THEIR rules, which apply only to them. I suspect that the less we know about their game, the better off we are. That is their business, not ours – and simply becoming very clear on who we are and acting accordingly is what will get us out of this ludicrous mess. I feel as if I have arrived, which is why I am writing this… now.  

     I could always sense what was wrong when I heard the latest and greatest information because it was complicated and the documents involved were egregiously long and legal. I always said, “If it isn’t simple, it isn’t accurate. If most people cannot grasp the concept, then it isn’t accurate. If it involves knowing the policies of the Psychopathocracy, then it isn’t accurate.” Consequently, I knew that I would know the truth when it showed up because it would be simple – something that we could all see and grasp (if we truly remembered who we are) and it would have nothing to do with any corporate policy manual. 

     So, whilst reading Braden’s book, the penny dropped… I remembered who I am. I clearly saw all I need to know about how to handle the public. There is a Trust, evidenced by the NAME; my parents were the Grantors of the value, the Province of Ontario registered it, so it is the Owner and Trustee, all public servants are Agents for the Trustee, and, the Trust/NAME itself is the Beneficiary-in-fact. The entire game of Commerce is played for the beneficiaries. Needless to say, the public isn’t about to create a game which doesn’t benefit them, so, ‘beneficiaries’ includes them. My parents granted the original value to the NAME/Trust, via their signatures, and, over the years, I gave it value, via my labor. I cannot be involved in commerce so I use the NAME/Trust in order for me to function in a society which is based upon commerce. Think ‘Monopoly®™’ We require a token to play, and the only money is that within the game. There is no ‘money’ outside the game.

     I guess it is human nature to try to get out of doing one’s job, yet, since I stand to lose, it would behoove me to ensure that the servants serve not only themselves but also me. I hold all public Trust corporations in trust, and, if an agent becomes ‘un-trust-worthy’, e.g.: if he neglects his fiduciary duty and pretends that I am the Trustee – the one responsible for settling and adjusting the Trust’s accounts – then, I am obliged to remind him of his oath of office, wherein he has sworn ‘to serve and protect’ me and my rights. It is the trust owner, trustee, and agents who have a job to do – not I. Since their debts are their business, not mine, and, since the one who creates the liability must provide the remedy, they are the ones required to settle all charges against the Trust. If they refuse, then they are in violation of public policy and the criminal code and I would be obliged to lay claim against them for Breach of the public Trust and Breach of Oath of Office.

     Will we soon lay claims against doctors for Breach of their Hippocratic Oath wherein they swear: “I will… never do harm to anyone”? Taking down some of the medical mafia might move ‘medicine’ out of its present position of the #1 cause of death on this continent. 

     Maybe we ought just to say that we do not choose to be recognized through the Name and, unless they can prove that we are required to be or that we are a Trust or a Name, why are they trying to get us to pay a debt that belongs to the public, particularly when we cannot ‘pay’? There is no money, and we are not even permitted to play the game, let alone incur debt. The charge is against the Trust; who is the Trustee? We are not, so, who is the one required to settle the account? They have the wrong party. We wish we could settle it for them yet we do not have access to the account; we cannot take from it; we can only give value to it. Haven’t we done that, already? How could they have set up, for example, a credit card, if we didn’t give them the value up front? Now that they have created debt for that account, aren’t they the ones liable for the remedy, for setting off the debt, for balancing the account? This has nothing to do with us.

     Whoever created the debt is the one responsible for settling it, yet, they will do everything to try to make us liable. But why would any of us willingly go to court? A place where we were not invited, where we have no standing, where our chances of prevailing are almost nil, where we are not being compensated for our time or effort for a charge which has nothing to do with us, and for which the agent for the Trustee is not only already in the court but also the one legally obliged to settle the account for the Trust/Name?  I heard that one judge, upon hearing a fellow lament that he is not the Name, ask, “Well, if you’re not the Name, why are you here?”

     Why have we been doing the servants’ work for them? Because they tricked us into believing that we are responsible for balancing the books of the Trust (the name of which we have continuously been told is our ‘name’ and is not), for which we are NOT Trustee, and we forgot to question this, all because… we had yet to remember who we are.   

The Solution: Nothing We Could Ever Have ‘Found’ – We Had to ‘Arrive’.

The only thing in existence in the universe is energy. Knowing how to make that work for us is all we need to know. The only way we can make energy work for us is to know who we are.

     Studying rules to a game which appears to be made up and controlled by ‘them’ is a waste of time. There are only a few things we need to know about ‘them’. Our experience of them exists for the same reason that our experience of anything exists – because we created it. We created ‘them’ and our experiences with them, in order to discover who we are. Our experiences of ‘them’ are solely for the purpose of our spiritual evolution, which happens to entail challenging ourselves to discover the truth about our power. This is all an illusion and we are simply here to observe our conduct which will reveal the degree to which we realize our all-powerful nature. The reason we cannot win by finding a solution within their rules is because that would ruin the game. We have forgotten that it is OUR game. Our only rule is: we can’t win until we remember who we are. It’s a Catch 22. We can’t win because we don’t know who we are but as soon as we remember, the game ceases to exist. Therein lies the win because the game was designed for us to discover ourselves and, when we do, its over.

     We created antagonists solely for the drama since ‘they’ appear to be sub-plots to the main plot which is the drama of observing ourselves. I’ve noticed that many emails I receive report some form of theft of our basic rights. The most righteous of the writers complain of the new ‘laws’ which restrict our choices of healthcare. Did it ever cross their minds that this might be good news?  If we can’t have these ‘health products’, I guess we’ll have to realize who we are, learn that there is nothing outside ourselves, and go about healing ourselves. Whenever I hear about this sort of thing, I always take a look at it from another perspective. When I worked at Banff hospital, someone complained that “The Province is no longer going to pay for …..” (some procedure). Nurses were angry. I told them that this is good news because this is pushing people to take responsibility for their own health. Medicine or Naturopathy or whatever… they are all external and no matter what ‘the Province’ does or no longer will do, they are forcing us to get it through our skulls that we can create perfect health all by ourselves. We do not need anything or anyone for the things in life which we have been programmed to believe that we can obtain only from the ‘professionals’ – teachers, doctors (allopathic or otherwise), ministers, lawyers, etc. Haven’t we learned, yet, that none of them is as good as our own intuition, which is our connection to Spirit? Those who send out this sort of news do not know who they are and, maybe, are as threatening to our realization of our personal power as any other well-programmed bureaucrat. The mere fact that some have made distinctions between allopathy and naturopathy tells me that they do not see the distinction between looking within and looking without.

     Putting our time, attention, energy, and emotion into trying to correct something which ‘appears’ to be outside ourselves is what David Icke calls ‘combing the mirror’. If we look into the mirror and can only anticipate a ‘bad hair day’, combing the mirror will not get us out the door any sooner. The only way to change anything that is going on in the mirror is to change the source of the reflection. We are that source. 

     Knowing who we are is the only thing that will allow us to change how we conduct ourselves which is the only thing that will alter the reflection. Responding to a situation any time but in the here and now will not work. This means that we cannot pre-empt the future and we cannot correct the past. Neither exists. The only thing we can do is respond in the moment. Intending to un-do what we have done in the past, or write documents to stave off potential difficult situations in the future, will only demonstrate to those whom we use for the purpose of discovering where we measure, on our enlightenment scale, that we have not become acquainted with our own unlimited power. If we had, we would not be dallying in affairs which have nothing to do with us. Only in the moment can we deal with what is occurring right now. Our point of power is in the now and any conduct which takes us out of now – into either the past or the future – will not serve us. 

     I always wanted to pave the way for an easier life and the only thing that I experienced was constant preparedness; I forgot to live in the here and now and, noticing that I have lived nearly six decades, I realize that much of that time has been spent either trying to un-do, balance, make up for my mistakes or prepare for the next situation so that I wouldn’t make any more mistakes. I hated getting ‘life’ wrong because my ego’s drug of choice, to cause me to feel ‘wrong’, was ‘regret’.

    In case you haven’t noticed, our society does not allow for mistakes. We are either threatened not to err or punished if we do. Since the best way to learn is to fail, it behooves us to ‘fail fast’. Only then, can we be open to success.

Success is going from failure to failure without any loss of enthusiasm. – Winston Churchill.

     Yet, we all live in fear. We actually are not permitted to experience the most efficient way to learn, without severe emotional, not to mention physical, mental, and spiritual repercussions. Our society is designed to keep us from venturing out, experimenting, throwing caution to the wind, because we are kept in fear of making mistakes. Society discourages us from ‘living’. We are punished if we don’t either make amends or correct our ways. The entire court system, which came from the ego mind, is based upon this.

     All the ‘attorney wannabes’ are studying the rules of a game they cannot win because, if they could actually win, they would no longer need or want to play it. After I jumped out of an aeroplane, I didn’t need to do it again. If you know you can do a thing, you don’t need to do it, yet we all must do that which we think we cannot do. It seems as if what we all think we cannot do is to state, on the spot, whatever is necessary to empower ourselves to prevail, in the here and now. I always said, “I’m better on paper.” What does this tell you? That I didn’t trust myself to conduct myself, in the moment, in a manner which demonstrates that I know who I am and that I am capable of demonstrating the love and power that I know I am.

     So, people are still digging in the same pit, year after year, with only slight tributaries, instead of surfacing to look around to see that the solution is in the here and now and can be only in the here and now.

You can’t plan a miracle. – Philippe Petit.

     Their intent, as mine, was to set up a situation so that we could not fail. This is an impossibility because, since each of us is the creator of our own circumstances, there could never be a ‘one-size fits all’. Where one might prevail, by saying the right thing in order to get out of a tight spot, the same words coming from the mouth of another might land him in jail. Therein lies the solution which is the miracle. If we simply BE who we are and act in the moment, we’ll create whatever we create, yet, all the while knowing that the circumstance that we create is precisely for our own information which is: to observe where we are on the ‘I know I am all love and all powerful’ scale.

     It seems we have come full cycle. We began by saying, “That’s not my name.”  A dozen years ago, that landed me in jail, but that is only because, although I was acutely aware of what I was not, I had only a flicker of an idea of who I was. My friend once said of me, “Mary may not know what she wants, but she sure knows what she doesn’t want!” Well, knowing what I didn’t want didn’t assist me in knowing what I want or even knowing where to look. It has been a long road, yet I have learned a couple of things. Observing something we resist will only empower it because ‘resistance’ is an extremely powerful energy and we will find ourselves at the effect of it. We cannot argue with quantum physics/mechanics. This is why those who are sending fear-filled emails will experience precisely what they believe; however, those of us who chuck them into the trash will not. Nothing exists without my observation – so, if I put my attention elsewhere, those things cease to exist… in my universe. If you continue to observe them, they will continue to exist in your universe.

     So, does ‘apocalypse’ mean ‘horror show’ or ‘unveiling’? It means ‘unveiling’ or ‘revelation’ to me, so this is what I will get. In my observation, I will be able to know the entire truth of this universe. If you believe the word means ‘hell and damnation’, end of the world, natural disasters, you will experience precisely that… your option.

When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change. - Wayne Dyer

     In his book, Fractal Time, Gregg Braden says that what 2012 will be depends upon how we choose to respond to all that occurs. We play a role in the creation of the shift of World Ages and nothing will be ‘happening to’ us. If we choose to respond with love, strength, and balance, the next World Age will be one of peace. I suspect that even if you choose from fear and you opt for greed, comfort, and profit, those of us who want the new World Age to be one of love and peace, will, with the strength of love energy, override your desire, so, if you can’t beat us – and you can’t – then consider joining us. In other words, it will take only a few of us to create what we want. You who want disaster cannot prevail.

     We won’t ever know what works until we try, but there is nothing to try. There is no paper which will circumvent what we are avoiding because the minute we file it, they (whom we created to do so) suddenly know that we don’t know who we are and they ignore the paper because why would they honor any paper we write when the very writing of it evidences that we don’t know who we are? Has anyone ever received any worthwhile answers to questions we post to them? I think that it is alright that we know how they operate, as long as we do not let them know that we know.

Have more than thou showest; speak less than thou knowest. – William Shakespeare. 

     In other words, never fire their laws back to them because that appears as if we think they matter. We make the illusion real. I think if we write anything, the less legal-land crap we include, the more effective it will be. All we have to let them know, right here, right now, in the moment, is, “I don’t know your business but I do know it isn’t mine.”

     If we were courageous, had no fear, knowing that all of life is our creation of circumstances to measure our fear, we would jump in and deal with the alleged consequences. The only way to be in control is to be willing to be out of control; if we are willing to die, we cannot die. If we had no fear, we could be who we are. Whatever occurred, we could simply include, just because we would know that we can never die and it would all be just part of the movie. Who lives like that? 

     The movie, Man On Wire, proves that Philippe Petit lives like that. This is the man who walked on a wire between the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in 1974. When he walks a wire in a place that the local constabulary considers ‘illegal’, he gets arrested. He’s been arrested over 500 times in his career. (This causes me to wonder what I have been doing with my time.) He does not see these arrests as something that ought not to be. His arrests are just the finale to his theatricals. He tells us that we must ‘exercise rebellion’. He handles every situation in the ‘now’.

     When we are forced to handle a situation, we must handle it in the here and now. If the situation is on paper, we must handle the situation as close to ‘now’ as possible, which ought to be considered as 72 hours because the ones to whom we are responding will consider that ‘now’ (they are fictions… what do they know about ‘now’?) In other words, our tactics change with each situation. At the moment the Name is ‘charged’, I think we ought to let them know that we do not consent to being recognized through the Name. I can provide the Statement of Birth as proof that the Name belongs to the province and a declaration that I have nothing to do with it. My signature is not on it. This is their business, not mine. 

     However, in a case where the public already has our cash, we must conduct ourselves properly in the moment. This means that we tell them, as soon as possible, that the fruits of our labor have ended up in the public as a tax, which is in violation of public policy and so we ought to file for a tax return (return of the tax). Since it is ALL tax, we can go to our receipts. I would just put it all into a cover letter, put the NAME and the amount to be refunded on a ‘tax return’ form, sign it, and beg their pardon if I haven’t done this properly and, if they please, tell me what I can do to correct it – which forms to use, etc. Again, this is their business, not mine. I don’t mind assisting them, but I ought not to be expected to do it alone.

     “Whoever creates the liability must provide the remedy.” We have all heard it and seem to have forgotten it. So, whoever charges, creates the debt, or sends the bill is responsible for discharging, settling the debt, and balancing the books. Since all debt is created on paper, all debt can be discharged with… other pieces of paper. This has nothing to do with me since it is impossible for me to create any liability because I do not, will not, and cannot operate in commerce. Since those in the public must know this, I think a gentle reminder is all that is required.

     Again, since we live in the ‘now’, in fact, must live in the ‘now’, we cannot pre-empt today for the future and we cannot explain tomorrow for the past. Our point of power is now, in the moment. There is no other time and living in the past or future is only disempowering. Do not handle anything which does not require ‘handling’ RIGHT NOW. Remember Occam’s Razor: eliminate non-essentials. The procrastinator’s oath is, “Never put off until tomorrow what can be done, today”. However, that suggests that one is living for a ‘to-do list’ and not living in the now and doing whatever shows up next in life, which is all we are ever required to do. I admit, living life by the motto, “Be Here Now” is a facer. The ego mind so loathes it.

     I often imagine this scene: Someone… cop… anyone… asks for ID. If we produce ‘identification’, we admit to being the Name and, immediately, we become the liable party because, then, they know that we do not know who we are. THAT is what makes us liable – our not knowing who we are – nothing else. “Do you have ID?” ID!? “Identification.” Of what?  “You!” Well, you’re looking at me. “We need to see something that identifies you.”  Well, nothing is identical to me so what is it you really want? “Who are you?”  Who are you?  “We need to know who you are.” I am who I say I am. “Who do you say you are?” I am you, and if you don’t know that, then you don’t know who you are, so why would I discuss anything with someone who doesn’t know who he is?

     You can see where this might escalate… If you have any ID with you, which I do not recommend, it might be a good idea to carry the Statement of Birth – the document your parents signed, along with a Declaration stating that you do not consent to be recognized through the name on the document plus, maybe, an addendum, generic to any agent who might need to know. It is our responsibility to remember who we are. The instant that we do, all this will come to a screeching halt. The disappearance of the universe is contingent upon our remembering.

BEST VIDEOS

Secrets of Christmas

http://www.pharmacratic-inquisition.com/main/   (111 min.)

Everything We’ve Been Taught About Human Origins is Wrong!  Lloyd Pye

Part 1 of 8:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNGngZsxAhw  (2 hours)

Medical Mafia and the Genocidal Pharmaceutical Industry   

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPI7zdGdqo4   (5 min.)  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_FMr8kdvQY  (10 min.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfnIzYE4L8Y    (5 min.)

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=FPUHUpfDVgY     (5 min.) 

Money As Debt

http://www.wealthycanadians.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=54&Itemid=32    (47 min)

Hemp:  really why it is ‘illegal’

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=i6HESjH-Zsg   (11 min)

Media Mafia

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6073597531384658228   (58 min)

Scourge of Religion

2 videos -  2/3 down page (total: 20 min.)   http://www.truthbeknown.com/

No Aeroplanes Hit the WTC

Part 1 - http://www.livevideo.com/video/socialservice/  (42 min.)

Part 2  - http://www.livevideo.com/video/socialservice/7C5AF157976F4DDBA59B8680F6FF55BA/foxed-out-part1.aspx  (9 min.)

- and -

http://www.livevideo.com/video/socialservice/0815DBEC04BD49A0BC44240C89543471/foxed-out-part2.aspx  (8 min.)

Never Talk to the Police   

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=don%27t+talk+to+the+police&emb=0#  (47 min)  

Homeland Security Checkpoint

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDLlEh0×2XA&feature=related

Philosophy of Liberty

http://sedm.org/LibertyU/PhilosophyOfLiberty.htm

Great Global Warming Swindle 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzSzItt6h-s      (10 min)

Emotional Healing

EFT - Emotional Freedom Technique

http://www.emofree.com/splash/video_popup.asp    (7 min) * 4:07 - 5:15 

http://www.bradyates.net/page41.html   Tap for any change

Master Key by Charles Haanel

http://www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net/mp3files/m1.mp3, /m2.mp3, etc. 

Zero Limits    http://www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net/files/files1.htm

Humour

FCC FU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzaqXFcsH2U     (2.5 min)

Marriage and World Hunger  – Sam Kinison

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1GjyrQiSRs&feature=related   (6 min)

*

Featured Interview

August 7, 2008

We are joined by Mary Croft, author of “How I Clobbered Every Bureaucratic Cash - Confiscatory Agency Known to Man …… A Spiritual Economics Book on $$$ and Remembering Who You Are” to discuss Real Man or Woman vs. Artificial Person (Corporation), Law, Banking, Money and the Government System as it was intended to function. Topics Discussed: Mary’s Background, Bankruptcy, Gold reserve, The Federal Reserve, USG Corporation, IMF, Commercial Law, Money as a Symbolic Means of Exchange, Natural vs. Artificial, the Fraud system, Sovereignty and much more.. We move into the topic of Birth, Birth Certificates and the procedure of registration when you’re born and the fact that a corporation is set up as an artificial person to re-present you. We’ll also talk more about Amiralty Law, Law of the Sea, the esoteric connection to the etymology and Legal Writing. We also discuss the “Banksters” behind this, their mentality and where to go to learn more and keep up to speed with Mary’s new findings.

Red Ice Creations Radio Part One Click Here

Red Ice Creations Radio Part Two Click Here

Here We Go, Again.

A fellow sent me a link to Conscious Media Network which is interviews with people who tell us about the latest psychology, science, healing techniques, etc. – all fascinating, ‘good’ news. I truly enjoy this website. One can choose to whom to listen for 1/2 to 1 hour or so. Brilliant interviewer; brilliant website: consciousmedianetwork.com    

The picture I saw at the first of this video seemed to be one from Nazi concentration camps – bodies strewn into pits… you’ve seen them… we’ve all seen them. I scanned the video … a few minutes at the beginning, a few minutes here and there, and the last several minutes, waiting for the solution to all the horrors this video swore we were all about to encounter. There was none. The entire video was “fear propaganda”. Someone had hacked this lovely, enlightening, often amusing, interview website. So, I rang them and emailed them to apprise them that their site had been hacked and, it seemed, I was the only one who knew this.

Regina, the beautiful woman who does the interviews, responded:  ”Yes, we did put it up in response to viewer requests. A couple of them are rather highly connected (former MI6 and CIA) and felt it important to put it up with a warning, which we did do. I have some serious reservations about it as well as it leaves one feeling hopeless, which is not what we generally do. This is why we said on the page that we have no way of verifying the source. Still…..the question is “Is there truth in it?” Perhaps another question is “Even if there is truth in it, do we need to know?” Please let me know your opinion on both of those questions, I would appreciate it.”

Her most alarming comment … did you notice it? … was, “… in response to viewer requests, a couple of whom are rather highly connected  - former MI-6 and CIA.” This jumped out at me and my first question to her was, “How do you know they are “former”?” I suspect they are on Goebbels’ team. [Goebbels was the Nazi propaganda expert who had learned from Bernays (Freud's nephew) about how to manipulate the people simply by using fear. They knew that when people are in a state of fear, they are highly suggestible and obedient]

Here is what so many people are missing:  We create that which is on our minds and which is connected to an emotion – any emotion – because all emotions boil down to either ‘fear’ or ‘love’ and it doesn’t matter which. If emotion is involved, we will manifest that which is on our minds, whether we want it or do NOT want it.  

The propagandists want, on our minds, that which THEY want. So, they toss out precisely what they want us to think about. Whether we agree with it, disagree with it, fear it, love it, whatever, they do NOT care, as long as it is in our minds. Television is the best means by which they repetitiously instill what they want us to spend our time thinking about. Presently, I notice they want us to think that we have a choice in the matter of the next CEO of the corporation called USA, Inc. which has absolutely nothing to do with us because the CEO will be “appointed” by the psychopathocracy, not “elected” by the people of a country with a similar name.

In my article, “The 144,000″, I mention that if one is not part of the solution, he remains part of the problem, by continuing to promote, i.e.: cause people to think about, what the psychopathocracy wants us to think. (see the definition of psychopath: “… has deficits or deviations in several areas: interpersonal relationships, emotion, and self-control.” (All corporations have been proven, brilliantly, in the documentary film, “Corporation”, to be psychopathic. Most likely, so are the “suits” who live by their policies.)  So, these are NOT people whom we want suggesting to us where to put our attention.

Only when we stop giving these psychopaths our power, will they stop doing what they do. They NEED us to create for them that which they cannot. They have neither the numbers nor the frequency/vibration to create for themselves. (They also have not the means to create commercial energy – something we all know). They are emotionless; and emotion is required in order to create. They NEED our attention, our energy, our time!  They NEED us to keep thinking about what we do NOT want so that we will create that which is on our minds which is only what THEY want. If we watch TV, if we react to their threats, if we believe in Revelations, they will get what they want – FROM US. They are using our unique gift of emotion in order to get us to give them what they want. If we comply, if we fall for this deception, we are digging our own graves. We already know these ‘people’ cannot be trusted, so why promote what they want us to do for them?  Why do their dirty work for them?  If we bumped into a psychopath in the street, we would walk away from him, not tell the next passer-by that which he has spewed out to us. Yet, this is precisely what is happening every time someone sends an email full of the nonsense that these aberrant entities are propounding, if we do not offer a solution to go with it. Since the solution is: not to send the email in the first place, let’s stop all this nonsense which continues to waste people’s time, attention, energy, and emotion not to mention putting it out into cyberspace where anyone can happen upon it. This stuff is tantamount to ‘child porn’, in fact, worse, because child porn is just another promotion of the psychopaths, via those whose minds were open to it. It is the pervert who created it; all the psychopaths did was to inject the concept, via propaganda, into his mind. Same as those who sell drugs to kids. The drug-pusher did it but at the behest of the psychopaths who are the real promoters of the drug biz…. same with kids shooting kids… well, the list is endless.

When will people catch onto How the Mind Works, How Energy Works, What Causes the Manifestation of the Physical? The mere fact that I am giving this matter my time, attention, energy, and emotion, right now, is contrary to the entire point I am making. What a conundrum! Yet, I feel as if it is required of me in order to get through to unconscious people – those who are still protesting that which the psychopaths WANT us to protest. I’m not suggesting we remain unaware; I am suggesting that we notice it and move onto where WE want to be. Do not allow anyone to cause you to deviate from your path. If we truly know who we are, none of this will affect us; we’ll simply be able to say “no” and walk away.

Abraham uses a great analogy. I am at a buffet for a meal and I notice that lima beans are being served. I hate lima beans. Do I rant and rave and complain and then get every patron in the place to sign a petition to stop the restaurant from serving lima beans?  Or do I simply pass them by knowing that they are not for me and choose another vegetable? Some people actually WANT lima beans – believe it or not – so lima beans are fine … FOR THEM. Since lima beans are not something I would choose, I do not give them my attention, my time, my energy, or my emotion.

I ask that you all think about what you are emailing and, if you do not offer a solution to whatever you suspect is “wrong”, which immediately proves you have judged the matter, aka, already given it your time, attention, energy, and emotion and, hence, a life of its own, then you remain part of the problem and, as yet, are NOT part of the solution. What is it you want?  I suspect that I know what it is that most of you who pass along this dreck and arrant nonsense want. Your ego is driven by the desire to be recognized, in these cases, to be known as the one who knew first, the one who knows what is ‘really’ going on in the world, the one whom everyone will recall as, “He told me about that months ago; I sure wish I had listened to him, then.” This is grandiosity, egotism, and the scourge of what is keeping us from ascending into our higher selves. It is holding us back spiritually.
 
Are you quite certain that this is what you prefer?  Or do you prefer simply to be rid of all this CRAP!?  Only you can do it – by NOT giving it your attention, time, energy, and emotion.  Incidentally, if you think I am exempt from this, think again. Years ago, I was as ‘guilty’ of this as the next fellow. I managed to GET OVER IT!  This is how I know what is going on in the minds which have yet to make the leap into knowing who they are. Please, think through what it is YOU truly want and focus on only that. Create for yourself and your fellows, only! – not for those who intend to harm us by using, against us, our own power, talent, and creativity.

We MUST begin to function at a higher vibration/frequency than the psychopaths. Remember when your mother told you to “ignore your taunting older brother”?  Well, my mother told me that and it is true; he did go away. I’m not suggesting that he quit taunting me, I am saying that I essentially rose above it; I began to function at a higher vibration where he simply could not reach me. Nothing needed to be said, no protests, no fights. It was truly a win for me to realize that anyone who would treat his little sister like that was emotionally unsound. My knowing this afforded me the emotional resolve to shift ME – not him. No doubt, he is still doing what he does best but I don’t know about it because the result of my shift to a higher frequency was, simply, his disappearance from my life. 

For those of you who still think that we have to tell as many people as we can about what horrors are going on, I put forth, for your consideration, this: What we see going on in the world is the RESULT of our thinking. We don’t get to vote on the way things are; we already did. Do people have a right to know? Yes, however, since we don’t know which of the billions of possible future outcomes will manifest, it is ludicrous to presume the worst. Since we do know that fear of circumstances causes manifestation of more fearful circumstances (think ‘downward spiral’) than if there were no fear, let’s put our attention onto how we want things to be. We can change our minds about anything and, thereby, alter the outcome. If you are familiar with Lynne McTaggart, you’ll know that the instant we make any choice, billions of future possibilities are eliminated and billions more are created. Remote Viewing was developed by the military for THEIR purposes – NOT altruistic purposes. Knowing that infinite possibilities already exist, what the military did was to have participants’ minds, individually, focus on the outcome which the military wanted to create in order to suit their agenda. Since more people focusing on one thing meant more energy, it increased the possibility of that particular outcome. This tells us that we can do the same thing. This is quantum physics/mechanics. The observer observes not what is observed but, rather, what the observer brings to the observation. The more agreement we have, the stronger we are. Everything is the way it is because someone said so and someone else agreed to it. So, when we have rogues out there putting their attention onto an outcome that does not suit us, they are working for the psychopaths, not for us. We are all responsible for our experiences. Make your experiences what YOU want, not what the psychopaths want.

We WILL prevail. We must learn and know that it can be done ONLY from a spiritual, vibrational perspective. We must rise to a level where the psychopaths simply cannot go. What we intend for ourselves has NOTHING to do with them. It has to do with what WE want and where WE want to go. “Ignore them and they’ll go away” sounds trite, simplistic, and juvenile, yet, it is accurate… with one caveat. We do have work to do, yet, it is ON OURSELVES. We must quit giving our resources to them and start to use them for ourselves … whatever it takes to shift our emotional, spiritual, mental, and vibrational space/time to where/when they cannot go.
Let’s stay focused on what WE want - not what ‘they’ want from us. We must get our attention off commerce. Let’s all do what we love to do and serve our fellow man by doing it. Trust me, somehow, we’ll be taken care of …. and we don’t need to know how.

My final plea: Everything…. EVERYthing that has EVER been planned, attempted, and implemented, thus far, has NOT accomplished our intent of healing the problems of this planet. The psychopaths are STILL running the world AND most of us. Is it time to quit digging deeper in the same hole and think laterally for a solution? The ‘everything’ I mention refers to intending to change something outside ourselves – people, circumstances, institutions, policies, legislation, …. even nature. Shall we now take a look at the cause? Shall we now look to the true point of power? Those are WE. We are at cause and we are the power; nothing and no one else. We are the only entities which can be changed and we are the only ones who can implement said change. Hop to it!

Mary Croft - October 2008
www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net

Two Completely Different, Separate, Distinctive Forms of Accounting.

(I’ll make this as painless as I can)

If we go into a bank, find the “loan” officer, and say, “I want you to monetize some of my credit for me; what is your fee?”, he will not grasp this and ask if we want a loan. Do we explain, right then and there, that he will not be ‘lending’ us anything; he will be only performing a service for which he is already being compensated, in the form of a bi-weekly salary, to make such transactions, yet, what we want to know is, what percentage of said transaction does he charge for processing? .5%?, 3%?, … how much?

Or do we play the game and sign the note, hand it over, and deal with it later? What about the mortgage? Why would any sane man tell a bank that it can take his house from him if he fails to hand over a portion of his life and labour, over the next 20-30 years, in the form of notes which are meant for ‘private debt’ only – not ‘public debt’, and, to boot, in violation of public policy, after he has already fronted the credit to the bank for which he has received a cheque in return and that transaction was complete the instant that occurred? He would do that only if:

1. he were tricked into believing that his signature on the promissory note
a) had no value, and b) did not fund the monetization of the cheque he received; or,
2. he was a victim of extortion and fraud; or,
3. all of the above.

At the end of every bank day, all accounts must balance or nobody goes home. Banks are audited every month and if there is a glitch, I’m certain there are heavy-duty fines. No one leaves the bank at the end of the day until the ledger shows that Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable are balanced and zeroed. But, if the bank has lent out ‘money’ or even credit, wouldn’t there be an imbalance? Wouldn’t it show that the payable side of the ledger was in red or not matching the receivable side? Do banksters just hope that people will pay back what was lent out? Would such a huge industry trust this? Or would they get paid up front before anything ever left the bank? hmmm. I suspect that the reason that banks are the wealthiest institutions on the planet – maybe with the exception of the genocidal pharmaceutical industry – is because they get paid in advance before they risk any possible loss. When one is this big, one gets to call the shots. It would not work for them to sit around hoping that those to whom they gave cash, cheques, credit, etc. would swing ‘round to their place of biz every month in order to pay back what they ‘owe’. No corporation with any clout would do business that way. One might argue that they can sell the collateral, yet, banks are not in the business of pawnbroking; they are in the business of amassing cash. Pawnbroking is not a multibillion dollar industry. Wasting their time, even subcontracting it out to vendors, is not their style. They simply want the cash to roll in and so they set up their business plan well in advance of any alleged loan, in order to have that work for them. So, have we established that “hoping” to get paid back, even with collateral, is not good business sense?

A friend complained recently, “I’m in so much debt; I don’t know what to do.” Clearly, she had not read my book which emphatically points out that men and women cannot possibly be ‘in debt’. We cannot pay a debt, ergo, we cannot incur debt. It is an impossibility. Only the public can incur debt and incur it they do. Yet, this is their debt, not ours. We make the mistake of falling for their inflicting upon us the responsibility of paying their debt simply because they have programmed us into believing that we are the liable party. How did they manage this? By convincing us that we are a name and when they charge the Name, this makes us the surety – the one responsible for paying the charge. This is fine as long as we know how to do so, yet, we have been convinced that we can pay only with our labour which we exchange for dollars.

The glitch is that public entities can not pay their own debts because they are bankrupt and no bankrupt entity has any credit. Since we believe we must earn our living, when the bills arrive, we think we must pay. But, how can we do that when there are two entirely separate forms of ‘accounting’ and the one in which we operate – ‘compensation for our labour’ – has nothing to do with the form of ‘accounting’ which the public uses to ‘adjust its books’. The accounting sciences of private exchange and public bookkeeping are as unrelated as any other of the sciences, e.g.: Medicine and Health, which have only one thing in common – the human body, yet, that is where it all comes to a screeching halt. One involves pharmaceuticals and medical treatments which keep a body ill; the other involves healing by nature which results in a body becoming healthy. One is based upon big business, the other is handled by the spirit inhabiting the body. The differences between these two sciences are innumerable compared to the one and only similarity.

This is tantamount to Astronomy and Astrology. They have one thing in common – stars. After that, the differences between the two sciences are too numerous to list. They are completely unrelated; just as the means by which we men and women become compensated by one to whom we have given our energy and time and the means by which the public creates debt upon its books and desperately searches for someone willing to off-set it and allow them to balance their books. The first is known as ‘money of exchange’ (compensation) and the second is known as ‘money of account’ (adjusting/balancing the books). It is called ‘double-entry bookkeeping’. The two are completely unrelated, however, we have been tricked into believing that the two systems cross over. They do not and cannot.

When we offer our energy and our time in the form of ‘labour’ we expect to be compensated for it by the one to whom we give it. I shan’t elaborate upon the spiritual mess into which this has gotten us; suffice it to say that this has to stop if we are to prevail against the psychopathocracy which runs the world, if for no other reason than it will train our minds to see the distinction between the two forms of accounting. Whether we are compensated by substance, i.e.: gold, silver, gifts, time, etc. or the paper commonly known as ‘money’ matters not to us because we have negotiated and agreed to what is fair ‘money of exchange’. Due to that agreement, it is no one else’s business. It is a private contract based upon a meeting of the minds. No third party is permitted. Accordingly, that compensation, no matter what form it takes, cannot be taxed by a third party which might suddenly want in on the contract. It is a private contract, not a public contract.

The other, completely unrelated, form of accounting is ‘money of account’ wherein the public creates debt. This is done all the time because this is what the public does. This is how corporations come into being, aeroports get built, and yes, (yawn) roads get maintained (where some people still think that taxes go). It has nothing to do with what we do; it is simply how they operate in order to provide us what we need and want. They are involved in work which has to do with commerce. We are not or, at least, ought not to be, yet, since we are, please let’s learn how to do so without ruining our lives.

Public Accounting = Money of Account aka Double-entry Bookkeeping aka Debt Set-off

The public sends us a bill so we can set-off their debt. The bill’s amount indicates the amount of our unlimited credit they have used without our consent. They created it, but, they cannot set it off. They require us to do this for them. I know that, at this late date, we have had enough of them, yet, really, the problem is that no one ever told us how do to this. A man can neither incur nor pay any debt. We could do them a favour and offset it for them. We mustn’t allow them to confuse us with the two forms of accounting. Money of Exchange = substance based upon your labour which is real and Money of Account = just bookkeeping entries. All they need is our acceptance of their charges, our signature representing our authorization to access the treasury account, and then we instruct IRS/CRA, via tax forms, to handle the tax return.

Now that the public is using our credit, we ought to be compensated for it, right? It is our value they are using. Remember, they have no value themselves so they require ours. A line from A Course In Miracles reads: “Nothing ever leaves its source”. Since all value must return to source and close the circuit or ‘close the accounting’, when we are charged/billed, it is simply a request on the part of the public to set-off their charges for them. When it comes full circle, we will be compensated. How?

The latest is the 1099 OID, W9, 1040V and T5008, T7DR, depending upon where we operate in commerce … but it is still commerce, no matter where we are. Whatever value we personally have put into the public is against public policy; we were never meant to put our value into the public (since 1933), however since we did, it is 100% tax – dollar for dollar. Therefore, the corporation to which we gave it owes tax to IRS/CRA because it is withholding it and, if we don’t claim back our funds, they will keep it. The corporation will file a 1099 OID/ T5008 claiming that it is the source of the value and we now know that it is not – we are. If we do not file the correct forms with IRS/CRA in order to claim back that which we erringly put into the public, now IRS/CRA comes after us to pay the tax because, as it stands, it appears as if the ‘source’ of value was the corporation – because its filings indicate that. Since the tax must be paid and 100% of what we put into the public is tax, then someone has to pay, right?

If we have paid thrice for an item (1. the original credit to create it came from us, the principal, via our bond which pre-paid it (see my book); 2. the accepted return of their charge, indicated by our signature and social number; and, 3. cash/cheque/card, etc. aka ‘debt’ payment) when it ought to have been only the first two, then we are entitled to the return of the third – the cash. Unless we ask IRS/CRA for a “tax return”, it cannot balance its books and it will come after our labour (or compensation therefrom – i.e.: cash) in order for it to do so. So, we send IRS/CRA the forms identifying the correct source of the value which is we and not the corporation, and then IRS/CRA goes after them for ‘unreported income’ and 100% is returned to us, the principal from whom all credit came. These corporations, courts, etc. are all tax delinquents and in violation of public policy and the bankruptcy.

There can be NO “paying off” a public debt. The National Debt (which doesn’t really exist… well, it does, on paper, because the corporations USA, Inc. and CANADA, Inc. owe us, the shareholders – even though the media continue to lie, “Americans are in trillions of dollars of debt”. It is the corporations which are in ‘debt’ and this is because we continue to give them our debt notes/dollars and this increases the debt. See my book wherein I reveal that “working for a living” is only making the problem worse… for all of us. Paying a corporation with debt notes aka “dollars” only doubles its debt. One would think the board would not want this, yet, they want that debt because this provides them ammunition to get us to ‘pay’ more on the alleged national debt. But there can be no ‘debt’ because everything is pre-paid. The corporations couldn’t exist or operate unless we funded them in the first place with our credit via the bond via the Birth Certificate. Yet, if we “set off” public debt, we reduce the “national debt”.

Credit to them is debt to us and vice versa. Keep in mind that those at the bottom of the pyramid are trained not to know this because the top of the pyramid has been charged (by the world bank, the IMF) with extorting the labour and lives of those of us from whom they derive ALL their wealth in the form of dollars which is credit to those at the top. In other words, if we give them our value in the form of dollars, the corporation sees this as a debt – because it IS debt – and therefore has more debt to set-off, which is the way they want it because then they and their partners in crime, the feds and the banks, can call it the “national debt” which of course can’t exist, can’t be “paid”, and yet, can be set-off, however, the CEOs et al, perceive our dollars in the same way we do – dollars get us what we want.

Commerce is a mirror of what is true. Debt=credit for men and women, yet, credit=debt for corporations. It is crazy. If we continue to pay dollars when we are not obligated to do so, this makes our situation worse because we are giving debt to the public, ergo, the excuse to demand more dollars, and giving the people behind the fictional corporations the very thing we are intending to keep for ourselves and our families in order to acquire what we need and want. What an incredible scam! Remember, though, not paying might get us into trouble that we don’t personally want so, let’s have another do our fighting for us. Call in the IRS!!

All IRS/CRA wants, like any other corporation, is to balance their books and if we prevent this, by not filing properly, they come after us, which now makes sense to me. If we comply, by filing the proper forms for a return of all the labour we have put into the public which messed up their double-entry bookkeeping, we can charge (energize) IRS/CRA with securing our value from where we left it and return it to us, the principal and source of all value. And we wondered why they call it a “Tax Return”!  It is so they can return the tax to the principal because it is our credit the public has been stealing via filing false claims which is in violation of the criminal code (which is all based upon commerce… remember there are no laws as we think of them; all statutes, codes, etc. are commercial law) This is why corporations appear so wealthy when, in fact, in commerce, corporations cannot show a profit. (Their books must balance at the end of the day, just as the banks’ books must balance or the auditors would have a field day.) Huh?!?! They are the wealthiest “persons” on the planet. (remember the definition of “person” is “corporation” and “legal fiction”.) But it is the board members, not the corporation, who are wealthy. We have been letting them steal our labour and our lives!

Quite a concept, eh?  IRS/CRA truly do work for our benefit!  (We can go back 3 tax years and get back 100% of everything we have ‘paid’) All this time, we’ve been fighting them. As Winston says, “The IRS is my new best-friend.”

Money of Exchange (dollars) must NOT co-mingle with Money of Account (our ability to set-off public debt via acceptance and our signature). We cannot pay a debt with a debt and, yet, we do it every second of the day. We must accept their bills, return them with our signatures (the TRUE value) and the Treasury Account number (SSN/SIN) and, if vendors ask to be paid again, then, we honour them by giving them money of exchange (because we won’t be able to leave the shops without their thinking they have received something for the goods, even though we know that the goods are not for what we are ‘paying’ – we exchange payment for the receipt (see my book), yet, since ‘paying’ messes up their books – i.e.: doubles their debt – we handle this by having IRS/CRA get it back not only for us but also for all involved because it is a huge accounting error – not to mention, paying with cash is a crime. It only gets crazier, doesn’t it? This is why we will ultimately move into a cashless society! … for our benefit, not theirs, and to think that, for decades, I feared this ! Now I see that I am instrumental in its implementation.

Remember that anything we receive from the public – tickets, court orders, bills, etc. – is an OFFER and all we are required to do is ACCEPT it, sign it back to them so they can balance their books. Their accounting has nothing to do with ours (ie: cash) and if they intend to convince us that we are to give them our labour/cash, IRS/CRA is in the biz of getting it back for us. Corporations and courts don’t like this, however, IRS/CRA is designed to collect tax – nothing personal, its just business. They are the best collection agents in the world as they work for the IMF. It is their way of telling us that if we file, we get our tax returned. (Yes, people are already doing this).

Court:
I’ll say it again: Never go to court – unless you are dragged and if you are, your first questions ought to be, “What is your TIN? What is your authority? Where is the 1099 OID?  (meaning: Prove your claim to MY credit. Are you trying to trick me into suretyship?) If we ask the right questions up front, they can’t get past the fact that we are not going to give them anything; rather, we will file a 1099 OID/T5008, listing the true source of value, and get back that amount. Put the courts out of commission! Call out the IRS!

Collections:
When a collection agent calls, I ask for their Tax ID Number. If they won’t tell, I say, “That’s OK, what’s your address?  I’ll send you a W9/Request for TIN and if you fail to complete and return it to me, you will be subject to IRS/CRA fines and penalties. Then we will talk about how much YOU OWE ME for your unauthorized use of my credit.”

***

If you are interested in a interim, non-commercial, financial remedy to the imminent economic shift, go to: http://spiritualeconomicsnow.net/remedy/ and http://www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net/form1.html This is the easiest, fastest, fairest, most equitable, and most ethical way to get cash into your mitts without involving the banks’ control over our lives. In his book Stop Being a Victim, the author discusses the myriad of Internet and Home-Based Business Opportunities and concludes that a ‘One-Up’ program, such as the one I offer, is the only ‘biz-opp’ which is fair and equitable to everyone – not just those at the top. This activity began over 5 years ago and never a glitch … because it is private.

by: Mary-Elizabeth: Croft
Posted: July 18, 2008

For more of my latest and greatest articles, go to: www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net

For my book: How I Clobbered Every Bureaucratic Cash-Confiscatory Agency Known to Man –– A Spiritual Economics Book on $$$ and Remembering Who You Are
go to: www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net/solutions/How_I_06.pdf

The Authority Hoax

To: All those who think they have authority over me – agents of IRS/CRA, insurance, bank, government, and, in particular, cops:

I know you think you have authority over me. What has caused you to think this? The only possible answer is that someone, whom you believe to have authority over YOU, has told you that you have authority over another. In other words, because we are all created equal, in order for you to believe in a concept which is contrary to this truth, you must have been programmed to believe a lie. Whoever did so is not your friend. What is true is that, unless one Man grants to another his God-given authority, it is impossible for another to have it. No one would willingly, knowingly, or intentionally grant another Man authority over his property, his body, or his life. So, if you believe that someone has authority over you, it is because you have either willingly granted it or you have been deceived into granting it to him and if you believe you have authority over me, it is because you believe in a false concept. Accordingly, you must provide proof that you do, indeed, have true – not what you might have obtained against my will – but, true authority over me. If you can’t prove it; you don’t have it.

Birth Certificate (aka: BC)

No man or woman has a NAME or is a NAME. Men and women use a NAME. Men and woman act in capacity of principal of a NAME which is on all documents based upon the Birth Certificate – which is not to be used to identify any Man (man or woman). The BC is a bond which evidences a treasury account which was set-up for the use of the bearer of the BC. Until recently, the BC, which is evidence of the account has never served us; it has only caused government officials to hold us as surety for charges against the account and we did not know how to accept this suretyship to our advantage.

In 1933, after the 1929 Depression – instigated by the banks to threaten governments to pay their debts – governments were forced to declare bankruptcy. Yet, they pledged the future labour and productivity of the people in order to repay the interest on the loans. When we work for ‘pay’, it only appears as if we are compensated for our labour. (What’s true is, then, we exchange the cheque – a promise to pay – for debt so we were never compensated at all. The only thing that occurred is that the company which allegedly paid us got off the hook for having to pay tax on an asset – our labour. The paycheque is their way of getting out of tax – nothing else. We did not ‘get paid’.) The NAME which is ‘paid’, via either cheque or direct deposit is owned by the province/state to which our parents gave a NAME to be registered. They were tricked into allowing the feds to create an account which could be charged. Because the NAME is so similar to what parents called their child, everyone came to believe that the NAME on the account is the child. The entity which is ‘paid’, owns the bank account, the house, car, etc. is the NAME which is owned by the state/province. This is why we do not ‘own’ our houses - in the estimation of the banks, yet, we most certainly do own what we have because we were the ones who gave the credit to obtain it and we are in lawful possession of it.

Recently, I asked a bank manager, “Why were you so adamant about my providing you ‘government-issued ID’ in order for you to obtain the precise ‘name’ in which to open the account when, now, I see you’ve listed the account in a name which is nothing like the name on the passport?” She had no answer.

We can no longer pay our debts, hence, we can no longer create debt because no bankrupt entity (government) can make a lawful claim against us. So, these entities charge the NAME and convince us that we ARE that NAME, thereby making us surety for the charge and hoping we will be the one to pay the tax on the funds which ‘they’ create in order to pay back the banks. This is how we have become slaves. We MUST quit identifying with the NAME. All that is required of us, in order to obtain all we need and desire, is our signature so that the store/service can charge the account for credit to make another of whatever we just purchased, at no cost to us, because we already paid for it when the feds floated a bond against the NAME which never would have existed if our parents hadn’t allowed them to use it. This account was designed for OUR benefit. The feds would never take a chance on acting fraudulently so when we look at different ‘laws’ we see that they do not apply to us, they apply to the feds so that they will not take advantage of us. We all have experienced the bureaucrats’ violation of their own laws and we have all asked, “Where can we go for our remedy when courts, once designed for law and justice, no longer exist?” The only courts in existence now are commercial courts meant solely for the collection of revenue in order to pay the interest on the loans to the World Bank…. not to mention pad the judges pension. Fortunately, via the Uniform Commercial Code, we can now regain our control.

When we all learn what is truly going, we will no longer believe that we are the NAME on the summons, we can start asking questions of cops, registries, IRS/CRA agents, bureaucrats. What name are you taxing/charging? Prove I am that NAME. I don’t have a NAME and I am not a NAME. I use a NAME when I operate in commerce just as the CEO of SEARS uses that NAME in commerce, yet, he ‘is’ not that NAME. The CEO can’t be held liable if it is SEARS which is being sued. This is how we must begin to think. We can act as surety for the NAME as long as we have our ducks in a row. The latest on this is to have IRS/CRA to handle, for us, all charges against the NAME. It seems that this is what they were designed to do all along; we simply got tricked into paying things with “tax” (cash) without knowing how to get the “tax return” accurate so that the tax is refunded.

Several years ago I opted to get a CANADA PASSPORT. Since one is required to have a guarantor, I asked my chiropractor to be that (only professionals are trust-worthy – because only they have a licence which can be revoked if their statements are discovered to be false – the investigation of which only a government minion would do since they all come from a presumption that we are as deceitful as they are – talk about ‘projection’, eh?…. The woman in the cage (literally and figuratively) asked me if, when they rang my chiropractor to determine if I were the liar they clearly (and accurately) suspect themselves to be, would he know me by that NAME. I exclaimed, “Oh, no, actually, he would know me better as Mary …..” She said, “You can’t use two names!” “Oh, yes, I can! – as long as it is not with intent to defraud.” She never said another word.

Property

The Natives/Indians have always known that no one can ‘own’ anything which was granted us by our Creator. This means that NO ONE – including any ‘government’ can own air, water, or land OR control anyone else’s respectful use of them. Yet, all we hear about is people ‘buying property’. How did this occur?

We have been programmed to believe that we can own something by labouring for it and this simply isn’t true. The only reason we are labouring for the $$$ to ‘buy’ property is because we must compensate the previous Man who paid the previous owner from whom he ‘bought’ the property. The one who staked it out originally could have claimed it for his own use, yet, he fell for the scam of having to pay the government. Now that he has invested his labour, he most certainly wants that, plus a profit, from anyone who buys it from him… and so on, when, in fact, no one was ever required to labour to pay for something he will never own. We can only ‘use’ what Nature has to offer. We were never meant to labour for anything we need or desire and we were never meant to ‘earn our living’. We were GIVEN all we could ever need or desire and we have been conned into believing that someone else owns it and if we want it, we’ll have to labour for that which we already have a natural, Creator-given right to use.

If you were to investigate who owns your land, you would see the NAME under “Tenant”. We now know that the NAME is owned by the state/province. We cannot be a tenant, driver, defendant, operator, consumer, etc. unless we agree to be called that. This ‘agreement’, which is nothing more than the result of conditioning, programming, intimidation, duress, coercion, threat, etc., can only get us into trouble because we do not know who we are. All the years I worked as a registered nurse, when one would ask me what I did, I was careful to reply, “I work as a nurse”, not, “I’m a nurse”. We tend to believe what we are told and we must remain vigilant about how it serves others for us to fall for their programming. People still believe they want to keep their jobs and, in order to do so, they must do as they are told. They presume that a job is a good thing to have, yet, if they were to question that premise, they might see that it is fear which is prompting them to behave in unethical ways which do not serve their fellows so that they can get the almighty ‘paycheque’ which is not payable to them anyway; it is payable to the NAME.

When we labour, we are not compensated for it because we cannot play the Commerce Game. Only the NAME, which we have been conditioned to believe identifies us… that we are the name, gets paid for our labour. So, how do we get compensated for our labour? We don’t. Not at all. Never. What are we doing with our lives?! We were tricked into playing the Commerce Game because those who run the world require a slave-labour force and… they got it.

Courts

The courts are no longer courts of law and justice; there are courts of commerce – only. No case goes to court which is not about “money”. Everything changed in 1933 or so when USA and Canada declared bankruptcy. No bankrupt entity can have any commercial claim or charge against anyone or anything else. The banks insisted on being paid the interest on the loan so the feds, already having experienced the power of the banks – (the Great Depression was thrust upon us as a warning of how they could completely destroy nations) – so the President and Prime Minister acquiesced and agreed to declare bankruptcy and realized that since the gold was gone and the natural resources of the land had already been relinquished, the only thing left was the future productivity and labour of the people. So, they began to tax us at every conceivable opportunity. This is why, in case you were wondering, there are so many completely senseless charges with which they stick us for the fruits of our labour at every turn. They began to create ‘laws’ which are so totally absurd that they will be broken just in the very act of living life. There is not one law which applies to the people. Talk about having gotten out-of-hand and under complete control of the bankers who wish to enslave us via the alleged governments – which are not governments but private, foreign, belligerent corporations acting only as minions/puppets of the banks. Unless we practise saying, “NO! Not only NO, but HELL, NO!”, next year, we won’t have the chance.

Here is what most people – and almost ALL attorneys – do not know about courts:
1. Courts no longer have anything to do with the private disputes between men and women; they are for the purpose of collecting revenue only. ‘Charges’ are only a smokescreen to create debt money. There is no compensation for ‘victims’.
2. When we think we are summonsed to court, the NAME on the summons is not ours; we have not been called as ‘accused’ or ‘defendant’; they are simply letting us know that the account in that NAME has been charged and, since we have an interest in that account, we might want to mozy over to the courthouse to make sure they do not steal the credit of said account; But…
3. if we go to court, they will presume we are the surety for the charges because our very going to court grants them jurisdiction over us. We wind up in court only if we think that it is our name on the summons – it is not. Accordingly, we must learn to handle the ‘charges’ administratively prior to court; essentially give them what they want so that they don’t want our bodies. We can give them what they want via our signatures.
4. We never see the alleged charges so we must realize they do not exist; same goes with a warrant. They exist only after they have tricked us into agreeing to contract. ALL charges and warrants are Money Orders. They are created for the purpose of selling bonds on the securities market, yet, until they have our signatures – as the signature IS the money – they are ‘Counterfeit Securities’ which they sell on the securities market and then pull every trick in the book to threaten us into being the surety – the one liable for the tax payable every time debt funds are created. As long as we don’t sign or agree to anything, they are stuck with the liability which is why they threaten us with jail, fines, etc. However, if we can know that the charges were never directed towards us in the first place, we can avoid all this by forcing them to prove their case, which is impossible for them to do. You see how frantically desperate they are to continue to pay the interest on the debt which can never, ever be done, by the way, so, the sooner we make this game work for ALL of us, the happier we’ll all be. If this sounds like a contradiction, it is simply a matter of position – debtor or creditor.

We must be careful that our signature does not get us into a position of debtor to a contract - the terms of which they have dictated. We want to accept their offer of contract so that we can own it and then control it and then settle the matter. We must remain in control of these events. It seems the only way to do this is to have our paper in place prior to these events. Then we can bond everyone involved so they work for us. More on this in another article.

If our courts were not commercial and we still had courts where people could take their disputes and expect an impartial verdict, we could have a court with a jury OF ONE’S PEERS to adjudicate and discern if one must make amends. I am always amused by jurors who have absolutely nothing in common with either the plaintiff or the alleged defendant. How can we get jurors who are absolutely impartial? – by the agreement of both the complainant and the accused - NOT their attorneys. How simple is that?

Laws

The only thing you need to know about laws – codes, rules, regulations, statutes, by-laws, ordinances, constitutions, legislations, laws, bills, and acts – is that they have nothing to do with you. NOTHING! The USA and CANADA are corporations and have a Policy Manual just as SEARS has. Unless we work for SEARS, their Policy Manual does not apply to us. The proof is in the definition of the words used in said ‘laws’. Remember, legalese truly is another language. They have used English words, of which we believe we know the meanings, and changed the meanings for the sole purpose of deceit.

In Canada’s Interpretation Act, section 35 (1) … (US codes have an equivalent)
“person”, or any word or expression descriptive of a person, includes a corporation;
“includes” means: “confines within”. Legal Maxim Blacks Law Dictionary Revised 4th Edition 1968 Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius - The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. I finally got around to looking up the word ‘Canada’.
“Canada, for greater certainty, includes the internal waters of Canada and the territorial sea of Canada.” So, Canada is not land; it is water! It is also a corporation registered with the SEC in Washington, DC.

Peace Officers vs. Policy Enforcers

All Peace Officers ought to be apprised of not only the above but also what follows. They will soon discover that they have been deceived even more than we have. We have ALL been lied to – this means we are foolish, yet, it means they are foolish AND complicit. We are waking up to what’s true, yet, cops have more concerns. Not only have they been deceived, as we have, but also they are passing along, to us, those lies. Their conflict is showing up in their private lives – suicides and spousal abuse is four (4!) times the national average. They are now catching on that their jobs are not good for their souls. Their third hit will be that they stand to be punished, by themselves out of guilt, or by those whom they have injured, or by those whom they presently believe will ‘save’ them from punishment for their having been good minions and carried out their vicious orders. I remind them to remember Nuremberg Principle IV: “Subordinates who claimed, “I was only following orders” were also executed”.
“No man escapes when freedom fails; the best men rot in filthy jails. And those who cried ‘Appease,’ ‘Appease, ‘Are hanged by those they tried to please!” - Hiram Mann

They are compromising their ethics and integrity for a paycheque and the ‘privilege’ of keeping their jobs, yet, one Royal Canadian Mounted Police officer told me that he did not know ONE officer who wouldn’t quit his job tomorrow if he had a job elsewhere. So, what they are doing, day in and day out, is harming their fellow Man – not to mention their own families – for a paycheque today, which adds to their personal debt, and a pension they’ll never see, for performing tasks the repercussions of which they will experience. What we do to another we do to ourselves.
Its difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it. – Upton Sinclair

Peace officers are employed to serve the people; they swore an oath of office and oath of allegiance. Subsequently, they unwittingly subcontracted with the province/state – a private corporation – employed as “policy enforcers” for the purpose of revenue collection. Accordingly, they cannot lawfully act as a peace officer and a policy enforcer at the same time, such as they do in court. They cannot swear in as a peace officer and then testify as a policy enforcer. Since we can and will claim them as our witnesses to the facts, they will not be able to testify that the Traffic Safety Act, or any other ‘act’ applies to us. They cannot serve both employers at once.

A driver licence and car registration, plates, and insurance are required only by those operating in commerce – taxi, bus, and delivery drivers. The rest of us are riding in our cars for our pleasure – not business.

As a peace officer, acting lawfully for the people, they cannot file charges at all. As a policy enforcer they can charge only corporate entities, yet, corporations cannot contract. Hence, they must trick a Man into contracting, yet, they can do that only by creating joinder which requires their making a legal determination. They are then in violation of the law because they do not have a licence to practise law.

We are all equal under the law of nature. All other ‘laws’ are fictions. Man is not required to have ID, yet, public servants, i.e.: police, ARE – because they agreed to operate under these ‘laws’ – we did not. Accordingly, we can demand, respectfully, that they identify themselves via their badges, identification, social number, and business cards which reveal their risk management and their bond number. If they fail to produce, they can be criminally charged with ‘concealment’.

So, you see that police are in a very precarious position. It is lose/lose for them and the sooner they catch on and get out while they can, the happier they and their families will be.

WHAT!? Me Work?

We are slave-labouring for nothing. We are working for free; we do not get compensated. The NAME is what gets paid and, since the NAME belongs to the province/state, it is that which gets paid. If you think the funds in your bank account are yours, wait until IRS/CRA thinks you owe it. They could never steal from us as we could then charge the bank with theft so you must see that the account is theirs – not ours. The NAME on bank accounts, birth certificates, passports, property deeds, driver licences, etc. belongs to the province/state and as long as you think it is your name or that said name identifies you, you will be liable for any and all charges which have nothing to do with you. However, we now can accept all charges and settle them immediately. We now allow the public access to our exemption account, give them back the voucher/money order, and then apprise IRS/CRA that the public has used our credit and they can then get the funds in order to return them to source (us) in the form of a tax return - as long as we file the correct forms.

We can no longer afford to work. When one fails to “make ends meet”, he is tempted to correct the effect instead of the cause so he tends to get more work – which appears to create more income – rather than to work less which will, in fact, heal the cause. To make the problem of the Commerce Game disappear completely, we will have to quit “work” altogether and begin to do what we love and serve others by doing that. Unless you are working for yourself or your friend or your family, you are supporting corporations which are destroying our lives, our fellows, and our planet. Only the elite could come up with the concept of ‘slave-labour’ – such an ingenious way to control the masses. As long as we continue to “work”, believing we were meant to “earn our living”, we will not be free.

“The main reason people struggle financially is because in school they learned to work for money but never learned to have money work for them.” Robert Kiyosaki (Rich Dad, Poor Dad). My comment on that is, “and don’t think that wasn’t by design.”

You might well ask, what can one do in the meantime while others are catching on to the fact that slave-labouring for a corporation or government can only make the problem worse for ALL of us.

If you are interested in a interim, non-commercial, financial remedy to the imminent economic shift, go to: http://spiritualeconomicsnow.net/remedy/ and http://www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net/form1.html This is the easiest, fastest, fairest, most equitable, and most ethical way to get cash into your mitts without involving the banks’ control over our lives. In his book Stop Being a Victim, the author discusses the myriad of Internet and Home-Based Business Opportunities and concludes that a ‘One-Up’ program, such as the one I offer, is the only ‘biz-opp’ which is fair and equitable to everyone – not just those at the top. This program began over 5 years ago and never a glitch … because it is private.

by: Mary-Elizabeth: Croft

July 7, 2008

For more of my latest and greatest articles, go to:
www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net

This article and subsequent articles will ultimately be made into a book: Remember Who You Are; Remember Who “They” Are, a sequel to How I Clobbered Every Bureaucratic Cash-Confiscatory Agency Known to Man –– A Spiritual Economics Book on $$$ and Remembering Who You Are

In an early episode of Boston Legal, a prosecuting attorney did his best to discredit a woman who, he said, was not as honest as she claimed because, when she was questioned by police, she reported one thing and, yet, here on the stand, she reported precisely the opposite. Immediately, I knew what she ought to have said and I was sorry the writers of the episode failed to see it. Rather, it would have cleared up something once and for all, but, it would have ruined many future episodes. The woman was under oath to state her truth on the stand, however, she was under no such obligation to say what is true to a police officer. There is no law against lying; it is done every second of the day in business, in families, in social situations and, it seems, lying is acceptable or, at least, not meant to hang upon anyone’s conscience. But, when we lie in commercial situations which involve the psychopathocracy* (coined by Dr. Kevin Barrett to describe the psychopaths in charge of the operation of our society - corporations, government, institutions, etc.), punishment awaits us. But this wasn’t the real problem.

The actual original problem arose from her having ‘talked with the police’ in the first place. They will ALWAYS use this against us, even if what we say is true and, in fact, if we have absolutely nothing to do with whatever they are questioning. “Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law” (as if there still exist any ‘courts of law’) means exactly that – it will be used AGAINST you. Cops NEVER say, “…can and will be used “in your favour” in a court of law.” So, this is proof enough: NEVER talk to the police… about ANYthing EVER, even when you are completely innocent. Don’t apprise them, teach them, explain anything (especially the ‘law’) … NOTHING!

As we all know about communications, with certain members of our families: “If you talk about anything more than the weather, you are wasting your time.” It applies here, yet, don’t even discuss the weather. We would be wasting our freedom. We are under no obligation to talk with them and, yet, they are under every obligation to answer our questions, simply because they are public servants, they work for us, they are at work and being paid during all this, not to mention court, and we are not being compensated for our time. We are NOT to waste our precious time and energy on them.

I flew to Toronto, recently, and was asked, by a man in some ‘official’ position, before I got to the “Security Checkpoint Charlie”, if I had any water bottles, gels, liquids, or lotions. I told him that the airline employees themselves tell us to drink more water whilst flying so, of course, I had water. He told me to dump it. I asked where I was going to get water to drink on board and he told me the water fountains on the other side (East Berlin). As long as I was in ‘West Berlin’, I could drink any sort of water I wanted, but passing through Checkpoint Charlie I was required to be waterless. It was then that I realized that I had failed to take my own advice which is, never say what is true to any “official” unless I had sworn to do so. I was under no obligation to do that.

So, I walked away, drank the remainder of my ionized, alkalinized, micro-clustered water and returned showing him my empty water bottle. I still had another water bottle in my bag and I was actually willing not to fly, over this matter, if I were challenged by ‘Security’. Along with my water bottle, I also had a bunch of “gels, lotions, and liquids” in my pack. I had consciously opted not to let them get away with this any longer. I was willing to call their bluff and, as they looked at my pack, I was ready to create a scene. If I were told I couldn’t take them onto the aeroplane, I was prepared to tell them to get my case out of the plane because I would not be flying and to march over to the airline counter to get a refund. I had it clear in my mind that it was not necessary for me to go to my aunt’s funeral.

No one said a word. I looked around me at all those who were taking off their shoes and all I could think of was the Nazi war films where we see people lining up to meet their death without even questioning it. Why didn’t these people at least attempt to flee? Surely, being shot was better than their probable fate! At every opportunity in dealing with these TSA (transportation security), I am very friendly and ask them about their jobs. Every single one KNOWS that his job is a joke. They look out from under their eyebrows at me and nod. It is a “make work” job. Those machines cost a fortune, for which we pay (if you scrutinize the contract for your air ticket, you’ll see the ‘security fee’ along with airport fees, departure fees, taxes, etc. listed; it is utter insanity.) We are paying, in most cases with our labour, to be humiliated. My suggestion is that we simply not take it any longer. I doubt it will take much. It is always a numbers game. CALL THEIR BLUFF.

“Name me a leader who has a better idea for homeland security than making us take off our shoes in airports and throw away our shampoo?” - Lee Iococca

Book a short flight, be willing to lose the cost, or better, pay for it with your signature in the first place, and put into your pack/carry-on as much contraband as you can, refuse to open your ‘laptop’ and to take off your shoes; in fact, I think we ought to refuse to go through the damn line at all. Anyway, make it work for you.

On another flight, a few years ago, someone wanted to take my nail scissors and I refused. I told them to call the airline and get someone over there asap and to get my case off the plane and put the scissors into my checked bag. Believe it or not they did it! Again, I was not going to stand for their nonsense. I admit I feigned crying and sobbed, “My mother gave me those scissors”, however, I was prepared to do whatever it took to prevail and I did. CALL THEIR BLUFF! They have absolutely no power until we give it to them VIA OUR CONSENT.

Bbe certain to see:

www.liveleak.com/e/b11_1212182183 and related videos.
I watched them four times. A man is driving on a highway in the middle of the desert in Arizona, I think about 30-40 miles from the Mexican border. He sees a STOP sign at Homeland Security with a bunch of state police cars and men in uniform. He is filming the entire episode. He opens his window just a crack, I suspect, and before the agent says anything, he asks, “Agent, what is your name?” She says, “What is your citizenship, Sir?” and here is how it goes: “Agent, what is your name?” “Sir, you need to tell me your citizenship.” “What is the purpose of the stop?” “What is your citizenship?” “Am I being detained?” “Are you an American citizen?” “Am I free to go?” “You need to state your citizenship.” “What is the purpose of this stop, Ma’am?” “Sir, I need your citizenship.” “Agent, what is your name.”

This goes on until she tells him to “pull over to the ‘secondary inspection’.” He never moves. He put down his camera which had snapped about 20 pics of all the other dozen or so agents who were there solely for the purpose of intimidating him. They also took photos of him on their cell phones. So, he had a video recorder and a camera and … only four (4) questions which he never stopped asking. After he sat there for a minute, without having moved over to “secondary inspection”, the agent said, “Sir, you’re blocking traffic; you’re going to have to move.” “Am I free to go?” “You are free to go. Leave this area, immediately.” As he said, and I paraphrase, “This is ONLY a show of force for purposes of intimidation to see who among us will obey and who among us know who we are.”

Notice he NEVER, EVER makes an assertion. NEVER does a statement escape his lips. *(I found this: www.liveleak.com/e/b11_1212182183 wherein he makes the statement: “I don’t need your permission.”) ONLY QUESTIONS! In particular, be sure to ask: “Who are you? What is your badge number? Do you have a business card to give me? What is your bond number? Who is your risk management?/bonding company?” My past incidents with alleged authorities flashed before my eyes and I immediately saw why I got into the trouble I did. It was because I made statements, thereby entering into a contract with them. For all of us who think we know more about commerce than most people and certainly more than the thugs with whom we are dealing, we must be VERY careful not to TELL them what we think we know. If they hear that we are willing to make a statement - of any kind, they will know that we are liable to make another statement and more than likely, about ourselves. Bingo! Contract! Its over for us. Then they know they can tell us what to do. It is mind-boggling when one finally gets how this works. As my friend, Gary, says, “The only two crimes in this world are ‘Being There’ and ‘Communicating’. Since we all know that ‘communication’ is the solution to almost everything, we hesitate to think that it is also the cause of most of our problems. Alleged authorities have the job of talking us out of our freedom and they see us as simply the catalyst for them to do so.

I talked with a friend who told me she had been arrested. I asked her what happened. She gave me some detail and told me that she told the cop, “I do not wish to enter into a contract with you.” Then she was in the back of a cop car. I asked, “How did that happen?” She gave me more explanation but seemed to skip over how she got from her car to the cop car. I asked again and she said, “He told me to get out of the car.” I said, “And you did? So, you contracted.” She truly had not seen that she had entered into a contract by obeying him. We must be so vigilant of this. Do not do anything they ask; do NOT “co-operate” because that “operation” in which we often “co - operate” is one which is against us, be polite but firm and only ASK questions. We have the ability to say, in the form of a question, anything we want to express. It is the question which changes everything. As questioner, we remain in control, we maintain our power, we remain the creditor, and, AS LONG AS WE ARE ASKING QUESTIONS, WE ARE INCAPABLE OF CONTRACTING. DO NOT CONTRACT!

For a cash solution without the abuse: www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net/remedy

June, Friday 13th, 2008

posted: www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net

********